Advertisement
DTCK vs KUBR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTCK is a Hold and KUBR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DTCK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKUBR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- DTCK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- KUBR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DTCK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KUBR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DTCK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KUBR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
DTCK (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а -0.03% price change this week, while KUBR (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +0.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.28%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.31%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.92% weekly)The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.54% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
| DTCK | KUBR | DTCK / KUBR | |
| Capitalization | 18.4M | 964M | 2% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 3.09M | - |
| Gain YTD | -28.028 | 36.000 | -78% |
| P/E Ratio | 31.77 | 397.40 | 8% |
| Revenue | N/A | 5.07M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 131K | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 253K | - |
KUBR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DTCK | KUBR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 29% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
Advertisement
DTCK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DTCK and CHSCL have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DTCK and CHSCL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DTCK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTCK | 100% | +3.52% | ||
| CHSCL - DTCK | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
| BG - DTCK | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| DOLE - DTCK | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
| ADM - DTCK | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| VFF - DTCK | 10% Poorly correlated | +3.96% | ||
More | ||||
KUBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KUBR has been loosely correlated with EDESY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KUBR jumps, then EDESY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KUBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KUBR | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| EDESY - KUBR | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RSSFF - KUBR | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UPBMF - KUBR | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EDBL - KUBR | -4% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| DTCK - KUBR | -6% Poorly correlated | +3.52% | ||
More | ||||