Advertisement
DTCWY vs DWHHF
To understand the difference between Deutsche Wohnen SE - ADR (DTCWY) vs. Deutsche Wohnen SE - Bearer Shares (DWHHF) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR and Bearer Shares
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Bearer Shares - Bearer shares are unregistered equity securities owned by the possessor of the physical share documents. The issuing firm neither registers the owner of the stock nor tracks transfers of ownership. Dividends are paid to owners of the physical coupons.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DTCWY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDWHHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- DTCWY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- DWHHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DTCWY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DWHHF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DTCWY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- DWHHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
DTCWY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -5.86% price change this week, while DWHHF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.43%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (-0.55% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| DTCWY | DWHHF | DTCWY / DWHHF | |
| Capitalization | 9.91B | 9.91B | 100% |
| EBITDA | -15.1M | -15.1M | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 2.329 | -11.344 | -21% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.18B | 1.18B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 467M | 467M | 100% |
| Total Debt | 86.4M | 86.4M | 100% |
DTCWY | DWHHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DTCWY's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DWHHF (76). This means that DTCWY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DWHHF’s over the last 12 months.
DTCWY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DWHHF (100). This means that DTCWY’s stock grew similarly to DWHHF’s over the last 12 months.
DTCWY's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as DWHHF (89). This means that DTCWY’s stock grew similarly to DWHHF’s over the last 12 months.
DWHHF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as DTCWY (61). This means that DWHHF’s stock grew similarly to DTCWY’s over the last 12 months.
DWHHF's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as DTCWY (86). This means that DWHHF’s stock grew similarly to DTCWY’s over the last 12 months.
| DTCWY | DWHHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 18% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 15% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 6 days ago 20% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AMUB | 19.08 | 0.05 | +0.24% |
| UBS ETRACS Alerian MLP ETN Series B | |||
| LJUL | 23.91 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Innovator Premium Income 15 Buf ETF -Jul | |||
| EQWL | 114.46 | -0.32 | -0.28% |
| Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | |||
| BBLU | 15.04 | -0.12 | -0.79% |
| EA Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF | |||
| BBLB | 84.11 | -0.90 | -1.06% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. TrsBd20+YrETF | |||
DTCWY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DTCWY has been loosely correlated with DWHHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DTCWY jumps, then DWHHF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DTCWY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTCWY | 100% | N/A | ||
| DWHHF - DTCWY | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SVAUF - DTCWY | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
| CTRGF - DTCWY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GRNNF - DTCWY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A |
DWHHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DWHHF has been loosely correlated with ARPTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DWHHF jumps, then ARPTF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DWHHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DWHHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ARPTF - DWHHF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DTCWY - DWHHF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HBUV - DWHHF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GRNNF - DWHHF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A |