DTCWY
Price
$13.15
Change
-$0.30 (-2.23%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
10.74B
SVAUF
Price
$3.38
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DTCWY vs SVAUF

Header iconDTCWY vs SVAUF Comparison
Open Charts DTCWY vs SVAUFBanner chart's image
Deutsche Wohnen SE
Price$13.15
Change-$0.30 (-2.23%)
Volume$116
Capitalization10.74B
Storagevault Canada
Price$3.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$45.14K
Capitalization1.24B
DTCWY vs SVAUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DTCWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DTCWY vs. SVAUF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTCWY is a Hold and SVAUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (DTCWY: $13.15 vs. SVAUF: $3.38)
Brand notoriety: DTCWY and SVAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DTCWY: 10% vs. SVAUF: 731%
Market capitalization -- DTCWY: $10.74B vs. SVAUF: $1.24B
DTCWY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $10.74B. SVAUF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DTCWY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSVAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DTCWY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SVAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DTCWY is a better buy in the long-term than SVAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DTCWY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVAUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DTCWY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SVAUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DTCWY is a better buy in the short-term than SVAUF.

Price Growth

DTCWY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SVAUF (@Real Estate Development) price change was -2.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+3.68% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DTCWY($10.7B) has a higher market cap than SVAUF($1.24B). SVAUF YTD gains are higher at: 23.358 vs. DTCWY (8.781). SVAUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 168M vs. DTCWY (-15.1M). DTCWY has more cash in the bank: 467M vs. SVAUF (21.5M). DTCWY has less debt than SVAUF: DTCWY (86.4M) vs SVAUF (2.18B). DTCWY has higher revenues than SVAUF: DTCWY (1.18B) vs SVAUF (319M).
DTCWYSVAUFDTCWY / SVAUF
Capitalization10.7B1.24B865%
EBITDA-15.1M168M-9%
Gain YTD8.78123.35838%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.18B319M371%
Total Cash467M21.5M2,172%
Total Debt86.4M2.18B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DTCWY vs SVAUF: Fundamental Ratings
DTCWY
SVAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8535
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10076
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DTCWY's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVAUF (99). This means that DTCWY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVAUF’s over the last 12 months.

SVAUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as DTCWY (100). This means that SVAUF’s stock grew similarly to DTCWY’s over the last 12 months.

SVAUF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DTCWY (100). This means that SVAUF’s stock grew similarly to DTCWY’s over the last 12 months.

SVAUF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as DTCWY (56). This means that SVAUF’s stock grew similarly to DTCWY’s over the last 12 months.

SVAUF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DTCWY (100). This means that SVAUF’s stock grew similarly to DTCWY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DTCWYSVAUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DTCWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSUTX130.82N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Utilities
SECAX11.84N/A
N/A
SEI Small Cap II A (SIIT)
UBVRX83.74N/A
N/A
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val R2
SOCUX21.57N/A
N/A
Spirit of America Utilities C
FSHOX130.70N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing

DTCWY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DTCWY has been loosely correlated with DWHHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DTCWY jumps, then DWHHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DTCWY
1D Price
Change %
DTCWY100%
N/A
DWHHF - DTCWY
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SVAUF - DTCWY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTRGF - DTCWY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRNNF - DTCWY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A

SVAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVAUF and AANNF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVAUF and AANNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVAUF
1D Price
Change %
SVAUF100%
N/A
AANNF - SVAUF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VONOY - SVAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
DTCWY - SVAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JLL - SVAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
OPEN - SVAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.22%
More