DTEAF
Price
$0.83
Change
+$0.02 (+2.47%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.18M
72 days until earnings call
SWSSF
Price
$2.00
Change
-$0.38 (-15.97%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
23.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DTEAF vs SWSSF

Header iconDTEAF vs SWSSF Comparison
Open Charts DTEAF vs SWSSFBanner chart's image
DAVIDsTEA
Price$0.83
Change+$0.02 (+2.47%)
Volume$21.11K
Capitalization11.18M
Swiss Wtr Decaffinated Coffee
Price$2.00
Change-$0.38 (-15.97%)
Volume$500
Capitalization23.18M
DTEAF vs SWSSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DTEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DTEAF vs. SWSSF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTEAF is a Hold and SWSSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (DTEAF: $0.83 vs. SWSSF: $2.00)
Brand notoriety: DTEAF and SWSSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DTEAF: 57% vs. SWSSF: 3%
Market capitalization -- DTEAF: $11.18M vs. SWSSF: $23.18M
DTEAF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $11.18M. SWSSF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $23.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DTEAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWSSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DTEAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SWSSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DTEAF is a better buy in the long-term than SWSSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DTEAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWSSF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DTEAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SWSSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SWSSF is a better buy in the short-term than DTEAF.

Price Growth

DTEAF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.48% price change this week, while SWSSF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -15.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

DTEAF is expected to report earnings on Sep 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.77% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWSSF($23.2M) has a higher market cap than DTEAF($11.2M). DTEAF YTD gains are higher at: 100.632 vs. SWSSF (-20.000).
DTEAFSWSSFDTEAF / SWSSF
Capitalization11.2M23.2M48%
EBITDAN/A16.9M-
Gain YTD100.632-20.000-503%
P/E RatioN/A83.33-
RevenueN/A166M-
Total CashN/A11.1M-
Total DebtN/A118M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DTEAF vs SWSSF: Fundamental Ratings
DTEAF
SWSSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9583
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3583
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DTEAF's Valuation (77) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SWSSF (77) in the null industry. This means that DTEAF’s stock grew similarly to SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.

DTEAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SWSSF (100) in the null industry. This means that DTEAF’s stock grew similarly to SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.

SWSSF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as DTEAF (95) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SWSSF’s stock grew similarly to DTEAF’s over the last 12 months.

DTEAF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWSSF (83) in the null industry. This means that DTEAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.

DTEAF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SWSSF (100) in the null industry. This means that DTEAF’s stock grew similarly to SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DTEAFSWSSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DTEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSPKF22.10N/A
N/A
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corp. Ltd.
TPCFF0.52N/A
N/A
Titan Logix Corp.
KSHOF9.53N/A
N/A
K S Holdings Corporation
ELTTF89.23N/A
N/A
Elmos Semiconductor AG
FWEDF1.96-0.01
-0.58%
Fireweed Metals Corp.

DTEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DTEAF and PRRFY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DTEAF and PRRFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DTEAF
1D Price
Change %
DTEAF100%
+1.39%
PRRFY - DTEAF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWSSF - DTEAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DAR - DTEAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
RMCF - DTEAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
NAII - DTEAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
More

SWSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWSSF and DTEAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWSSF and DTEAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWSSF
1D Price
Change %
SWSSF100%
N/A
DTEAF - SWSSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
PRRFY - SWSSF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TATYF - SWSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TATYY - SWSSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
SAPIF - SWSSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
More