Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DTLGX vs GFFFX
DTLGX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts DTLGX vs GFFFX
Wilshire Large Company Growth Invmt
Price$50.72
Change+$0.35 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.64M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$86.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
DTLGX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTLGX vs. GFFFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTLGX is a Hold and GFFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. DTLGX (276M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than DTLGX: GFFFX (0.49) vs DTLGX (0.00). DTLGX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: DTLGX (33 years) vs GFFFX (17 years). DTLGX (1.32) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). DTLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DTLGX: GFFFX (250) vs DTLGX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.18 vs. DTLGX (6.18). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.29 vs. DTLGX (-0.88).
| DTLGX | GFFFX | DTLGX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.40 | 325% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.40 | 330% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.378 | 16.017 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 276M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.18 | 7.18 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.34 | 63.61 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.88 | 35.29 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.06 | 91.20 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement