Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DTLGX vs GFFFX
DTLGX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts DTLGX vs GFFFX
Wilshire Large Company Growth Invmt
Price$49.28
Change-$0.05 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets274.96M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
DTLGX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DTLGX vs. GFFFX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTLGX is a Buy and GFFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. DTLGX (275M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than DTLGX: GFFFX (0.51) vs DTLGX (0.00). DTLGX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: DTLGX (33 years) vs GFFFX (17 years). DTLGX (1.32) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). DTLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DTLGX: GFFFX (250) vs DTLGX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.45 vs. DTLGX (17.20). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.16 vs. DTLGX (-0.05).
| DTLGX | GFFFX | DTLGX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.40 | 325% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.40 | 330% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.934 | 15.667 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 275M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.20 | 18.45 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.72 | 60.59 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.05 | 43.16 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.71 | 101.14 | 26% |