It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DTM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DTM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
DTM (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +7.71% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.59%.
DTM is expected to report earnings on Feb 14, 2025.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
DTM | QLV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago32% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago65% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago44% | 9 days ago66% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 6 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DTM has been closely correlated with WMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DTM jumps, then WMB could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLV has been loosely correlated with MSGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLV jumps, then MSGS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QLV | 100% | +0.62% | ||
MSGS - QLV | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
PECO - QLV | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
DTM - QLV | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
BIIB - QLV | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
RYAN - QLV | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.51% | ||
More |