DTWOF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
919.29K
LZM
Price
$4.60
Change
+$0.40 (+9.52%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
333.04M
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DTWOF vs LZM

Header iconDTWOF vs LZM Comparison
Open Charts DTWOF vs LZMBanner chart's image
D2 LITHIUM
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.25K
Capitalization919.29K
Lifezone Metals
Price$4.60
Change+$0.40 (+9.52%)
Volume$260.54K
Capitalization333.04M
DTWOF vs LZM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DTWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DTWOF vs. LZM commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DTWOF is a Hold and LZM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (DTWOF: $0.03 vs. LZM: $4.20)
Brand notoriety: DTWOF and LZM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DTWOF: 122% vs. LZM: 117%
Market capitalization -- DTWOF: $919.29K vs. LZM: $333.04M
DTWOF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $919.29K. LZM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $333.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DTWOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DTWOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DTWOF is a better buy in the long-term than LZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DTWOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LZM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DTWOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • LZM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LZM is a better buy in the short-term than DTWOF.

Price Growth

DTWOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -16.07% price change this week, while LZM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

LZM is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LZM($333M) has a higher market cap than DTWOF($919K). DTWOF YTD gains are higher at: 102.000 vs. LZM (-33.813). DTWOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.11M vs. LZM (-23.21M). LZM has more cash in the bank: 12.5M vs. DTWOF (1.2M). DTWOF has less debt than LZM: DTWOF (154K) vs LZM (31.4M). LZM has higher revenues than DTWOF: LZM (416K) vs DTWOF (0).
DTWOFLZMDTWOF / LZM
Capitalization919K333M0%
EBITDA6.11M-23.21M-26%
Gain YTD102.000-33.813-302%
P/E Ratio0.25N/A-
Revenue0416K-
Total Cash1.2M12.5M10%
Total Debt154K31.4M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DTWOF: Fundamental Ratings
DTWOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
83
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
9
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DTWOFLZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DTWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SID1.460.03
+2.10%
Companhia Siderurgica Nacional SA
ASR339.053.53
+1.05%
Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste SA
BTSGU83.440.14
+0.17%
BrightSpring Health Services
EHAB7.79-0.07
-0.89%
Enhabit
ATPC1.29-0.03
-2.27%
Agape ATP Corporation

DTWOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DTWOF and FRSPF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DTWOF and FRSPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DTWOF
1D Price
Change %
DTWOF100%
N/A
FRSPF - DTWOF
7%
Poorly correlated
-7.25%
LZM - DTWOF
6%
Poorly correlated
+9.52%
GIGGF - DTWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
NLIBF - DTWOF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTMFF - DTWOF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
More

LZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZM has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZM jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZM
1D Price
Change %
LZM100%
+9.52%
BHP - LZM
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
LAR - LZM
33%
Poorly correlated
+6.01%
RIO - LZM
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
TECK - LZM
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.70%
LAC - LZM
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
More