DUHP vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DUHP is a StrongSell and LRCX is a Sell.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 10 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DUHP | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DULL | 9.34 | 0.04 | +0.38% |
| MicroSectors™ Gold -3X Inverse Lvrgd ETN | |||
| PBDC | 33.58 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Putnam BDC Income ETF | |||
| FTXR | 35.56 | -0.08 | -0.22% |
| First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | |||
| FENY | 25.98 | -0.13 | -0.50% |
| Fidelity MSCI Energy ETF | |||
| QDEC | 27.26 | -0.14 | -0.53% |
| FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – Dec | |||
DUHP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DUHP has been closely correlated with MCHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DUHP jumps, then MCHP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DUHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUHP | 100% | -1.44% | ||
| MCHP - DUHP | 69% Closely correlated | -4.18% | ||
| LRCX - DUHP | 69% Closely correlated | -6.34% | ||
| KLAC - DUHP | 69% Closely correlated | -4.73% | ||
| TXN - DUHP | 68% Closely correlated | -2.37% | ||
| NXPI - DUHP | 67% Closely correlated | -3.09% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | -6.34% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 94% Closely correlated | -9.20% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 93% Closely correlated | -4.73% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 84% Closely correlated | -4.95% | ||
| VECO - LRCX | 83% Closely correlated | -3.22% | ||
| ONTO - LRCX | 81% Closely correlated | -3.77% | ||
More | ||||