It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DVA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFMCQF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DVA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMCQF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
DVA (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -5.62% price change this week, while FMCQF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -4.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -4.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.29%.
DVA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
DVA | FMCQF | DVA / FMCQF | |
Capitalization | 12B | 13.9B | 86% |
EBITDA | 2.32B | 3.35B | 69% |
Gain YTD | 40.865 | 9.429 | 433% |
P/E Ratio | 18.58 | 22.03 | 84% |
Revenue | 12.1B | 19.6B | 62% |
Total Cash | 392M | 1.22B | 32% |
Total Debt | 11.1B | 13.3B | 83% |
DVA | FMCQF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FMCQF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DVA (92) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that FMCQF’s stock grew significantly faster than DVA’s over the last 12 months.
DVA's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMCQF (100) in the null industry. This means that DVA’s stock grew significantly faster than FMCQF’s over the last 12 months.
DVA's SMR Rating (12) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMCQF (82) in the null industry. This means that DVA’s stock grew significantly faster than FMCQF’s over the last 12 months.
FMCQF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as DVA (53) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to DVA’s over the last 12 months.
FMCQF's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as DVA (73) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to DVA’s over the last 12 months.
DVA | FMCQF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago50% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago41% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago34% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago45% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago36% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago73% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago43% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DVA has been loosely correlated with FMS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DVA jumps, then FMS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DVA | 100% | -2.01% | ||
FMS - DVA | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
DNTCF - DVA | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
OPCH - DVA | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
CHE - DVA | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.80% | ||
FSNUY - DVA | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMCQF has been loosely correlated with DNTCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMCQF jumps, then DNTCF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMCQF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FMCQF | 100% | N/A | ||
DNTCF - FMCQF | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
FMS - FMCQF | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
DVA - FMCQF | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
THC - FMCQF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
EVGRF - FMCQF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |