Ad is loading...
DWAS vs FYC
DWAS vs FYC Comparison
Open Charts DWAS vs FYC
Invesco Dorsey Wright SmallCap Momt ETF
Price$86.44
Change-$4.06 (-4.49%)
Volume$25.67K
Net Assets751.54M
First Trust Small Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$75.13
Change-$2.54 (-3.27%)
Volume$24.09K
Net Assets465.51M
DWAS vs FYC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DWAS vs. FYC commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DWAS is a Hold and FYC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DWAS has more net assets: 752M vs. FYC (466M). FYC has a higher annual dividend yield than DWAS: FYC (-2.970) vs DWAS (-5.313). DWAS was incepted earlier than FYC: DWAS (13 years) vs FYC (14 years). DWAS has a higher turnover FYC (140.00) vs FYC (140.00).
| DWAS | FYC | DWAS / FYC | |
| Gain YTD | -5.313 | -2.970 | 179% |
| Net Assets | 752M | 466M | 161% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 181.00 | 140.00 | 129% |
| Yield | 1.31 | 0.46 | 282% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DWAS | FYC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 18 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FYC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYC has been closely correlated with JOE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYC jumps, then JOE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYC | 100% | -3.27% | ||
| JOE - FYC | 76% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| MTRN - FYC | 70% Closely correlated | -4.52% | ||
| IOSP - FYC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| TPG - FYC | 69% Closely correlated | -2.31% | ||
| ALG - FYC | 67% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||