Ad is loading...
DXNLX vs RMQCX
DXNLX vs RMQCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DXNLX vs. RMQCX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DXNLX is a Buy and RMQCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 678M vs. DXNLX (3.33M). DXNLX pays higher dividends than RMQCX: DXNLX (3.17) vs RMQCX (0.31). DXNLX was incepted earlier than RMQCX: DXNLX (9 years) vs RMQCX (10 years). RMQCX (2.71) is less costly to investors than DXNLX (1.98). DXNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1132.00 vs. RMQCX (334.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than DXNLX: RMQCX (2500) vs DXNLX (25000). DXNLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.02 vs. RMQCX (-12.81). RMQCX return over 5 years is better than : 117.07 vs. DXNLX (100.36).
| DXNLX | RMQCX | DXNLX / RMQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 2.17 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 2.71 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.328 | -16.939 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 2500 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.33M | 678M | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 0.31 | 1,010% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.02 | -12.81 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.98 | 29.87 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.36 | 117.07 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 598.77 | - |