Ad is loading...
DYNDF
Price
$12.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
WRDLY
Price
$3.37
Change
+$0.12 (+3.69%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

DYNDF vs WRDLY

Header iconDYNDF vs WRDLY Comparison
Open Charts DYNDF vs WRDLYBanner chart's image
DYE & DURHAM
Price$12.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.48K
CapitalizationN/A
Worldline SA
Price$3.37
Change+$0.12 (+3.69%)
Volume$28.79K
CapitalizationN/A
DYNDF vs WRDLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
WRDLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DYNDF vs. WRDLY commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DYNDF is a Hold and WRDLY is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (DYNDF: $12.06 vs. WRDLY: $3.37)
Brand notoriety: DYNDF and WRDLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DYNDF: 8% vs. WRDLY: 71%
Market capitalization -- DYNDF: $819.74M vs. WRDLY: $3.31B
DYNDF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $819.74M. WRDLY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DYNDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWRDLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DYNDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WRDLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DYNDF is a better buy in the long-term than WRDLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WRDLY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WRDLY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

DYNDF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -7.69% price change this week, while WRDLY (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WRDLY($3.31B) has a higher market cap than DYNDF($820M). DYNDF has higher P/E ratio than WRDLY: DYNDF (38.02) vs WRDLY (12.87). DYNDF YTD gains are higher at: 11.450 vs. WRDLY (-61.018). WRDLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 768M vs. DYNDF (160M). WRDLY has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. DYNDF (28.3M). DYNDF has less debt than WRDLY: DYNDF (1.27B) vs WRDLY (5.05B). WRDLY has higher revenues than DYNDF: WRDLY (4.02B) vs DYNDF (461M).
DYNDFWRDLYDYNDF / WRDLY
Capitalization820M3.31B25%
EBITDA160M768M21%
Gain YTD11.450-61.018-19%
P/E Ratio38.0212.87295%
Revenue461M4.02B11%
Total Cash28.3M1.17B2%
Total Debt1.27B5.05B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WRDLY: Fundamental Ratings
WRDLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WRDLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
WRDLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSNGX67.91-0.50
-0.73%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity I
GOCAX11.63-0.09
-0.77%
Gabelli International Small Cap A
GSZPX27.99-0.50
-1.76%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts P
NSNRX50.69-1.06
-2.05%
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R3
ETAHX32.89-1.63
-4.72%
Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences A

DYNDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DYNDF and VRNT have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DYNDF and VRNT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DYNDF
1D Price
Change %
DYNDF100%
N/A
VRNT - DYNDF
33%
Poorly correlated
-4.82%
SDGR - DYNDF
31%
Poorly correlated
-8.98%
SHOP - DYNDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
WRDLY - DYNDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.64%
STNE - DYNDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
More

WRDLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRDLY has been loosely correlated with FALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRDLY jumps, then FALC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRDLY
1D Price
Change %
WRDLY100%
+3.64%
FALC - WRDLY
41%
Loosely correlated
-6.68%
NEXXY - WRDLY
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ADYEY - WRDLY
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.71%
SDGR - WRDLY
33%
Loosely correlated
-8.98%
UPBD - WRDLY
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
More