Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DYNF vs GSLC
DYNF vs GSLC Comparison
Open Charts DYNF vs GSLC
iShares U.S. Equity Fac Rotation Act ETF
Price$55.30
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
Volume$1.45M
Net Assets19.68B
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US LgCp Eq ETF
Price$123.09
Change+$0.05 (+0.04%)
Volume$991.76K
Net Assets13.97B
DYNF vs GSLC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DYNF vs. GSLC commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DYNF is a Buy and GSLC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DYNF has more net assets: 19.7B vs. GSLC (14B). DYNF has a higher annual dividend yield than GSLC: DYNF (8.665) vs GSLC (7.486). DYNF was incepted earlier than GSLC: DYNF (6 years) vs GSLC (10 years). GSLC (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than DYNF (0.27). DYNF has a higher turnover GSLC (17.00) vs GSLC (17.00).
| DYNF | GSLC | DYNF / GSLC | |
| Gain YTD | 8.665 | 7.486 | 116% |
| Net Assets | 19.7B | 14B | 141% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.09 | 300% |
| Turnover | 90.00 | 17.00 | 529% |
| Yield | 1.08 | 1.09 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DYNF | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DYNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DYNF has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DYNF jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DYNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYNF | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| MS - DYNF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| TEL - DYNF | 77% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CRH - DYNF | 76% Closely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| APH - DYNF | 75% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| MET - DYNF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
More | ||||
GSLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSLC has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSLC jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLC | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| ARES - GSLC | 75% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| FTV - GSLC | 73% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| CDNS - GSLC | 72% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| SNPS - GSLC | 71% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| LRCX - GSLC | 70% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
More | ||||