Advertisement
GSLC vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLC is a Hold and LRCX is a Hold.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GSLC | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 17 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RISN | 30.86 | 0.15 | +0.48% |
| Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF | |||
| DCOR | 81.86 | 0.16 | +0.20% |
| Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | |||
| KBWD | 12.29 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco KBW High Dividend Yld Fincl ETF | |||
| FCXG | 12.22 | N/A | N/A |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long FCX Daily ETF | |||
| JFLX | 49.78 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| JPMorgan Flexible Debt ETF | |||
GSLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSLC has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSLC jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLC | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| ARES - GSLC | 75% Closely correlated | +4.31% | ||
| FTV - GSLC | 73% Closely correlated | +2.79% | ||
| CDNS - GSLC | 72% Closely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| SNPS - GSLC | 71% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| LRCX - GSLC | 70% Closely correlated | -4.56% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | -4.56% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 89% Closely correlated | -4.72% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 88% Closely correlated | -3.75% | ||
| NVMI - LRCX | 84% Closely correlated | -3.82% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 84% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -6.96% | ||
More | ||||