It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
E’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
E’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
E (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -2.14% price change this week, while TGS (@Integrated Oil) price change was +4.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +3.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.20%.
E is expected to report earnings on Feb 14, 2025.
TGS is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.
E | TGS | E / TGS | |
Capitalization | 50.5B | 2.31B | 2,187% |
EBITDA | 25.4B | 49.7B | 51% |
Gain YTD | -6.964 | 46.852 | -15% |
P/E Ratio | 10.53 | 241.29 | 4% |
Revenue | 101B | 139B | 73% |
Total Cash | N/A | 164B | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 201B | - |
E | TGS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
E's Valuation (38) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGS (85) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that E’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.
TGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for E (47) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than E’s over the last 12 months.
TGS's SMR Rating (66) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as E (79) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew similarly to E’s over the last 12 months.
TGS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as E (70) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew similarly to E’s over the last 12 months.
E's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGS (74) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that E’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.
E | TGS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 2 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago61% | 5 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 7 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 5 days ago77% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGS has been closely correlated with YPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGS jumps, then YPF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TGS | 100% | -0.40% | ||
YPF - TGS | 78% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
EC - TGS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
E - TGS | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.81% | ||
EQNR - TGS | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.14% | ||
SHEL - TGS | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
More |