Ad is loading...
E
Price
$28.89
Change
-$0.04 (-0.14%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
84 days until earnings call
TGS
Price
$29.56
Change
+$0.73 (+2.53%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
104 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

E vs TGS

Header iconE vs TGS Comparison
Open Charts E vs TGSBanner chart's image
ENI SpA
Price$28.89
Change-$0.04 (-0.14%)
Volume$206.11K
CapitalizationN/A
Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA
Price$29.56
Change+$0.73 (+2.53%)
Volume$372.58K
CapitalizationN/A
E vs TGS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
TGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
E vs. TGS commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is E is a StrongBuy and TGS is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (E: $28.89 vs. TGS: $29.56)
Brand notoriety: E and TGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: E: 78% vs. TGS: 181%
Market capitalization -- E: $50.53B vs. TGS: $2.31B
E [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $50.53B. TGS’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $2.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

E’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • E’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both E and TGS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

E’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • E’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TGS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, E is a better buy in the short-term than TGS.

Price Growth

E (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -0.22% price change this week, while TGS (@Integrated Oil) price change was +7.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

E is expected to report earnings on Feb 14, 2025.

TGS is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+1.96% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
E($50.5B) has a higher market cap than TGS($2.31B). TGS has higher P/E ratio than E: TGS (241.29) vs E (10.53). TGS YTD gains are higher at: 95.891 vs. E (-9.143). TGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.7B vs. E (25.4B). TGS has higher revenues than E: TGS (139B) vs E (101B).
ETGSE / TGS
Capitalization50.5B2.31B2,187%
EBITDA25.4B49.7B51%
Gain YTD-9.14395.891-10%
P/E Ratio10.53241.294%
Revenue101B139B73%
Total CashN/A164B-
Total DebtN/A201B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
E vs TGS: Fundamental Ratings
E
TGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6724
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
532
SMR RATING
1..100
8360
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7236
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1698
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

E's Valuation (36) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGS (86) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that E’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for E (53) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than E’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's SMR Rating (60) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as E (83) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew similarly to E’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for E (72) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than E’s over the last 12 months.

E's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Integrated Oil industry is significantly better than the same rating for TGS (98) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that E’s stock grew significantly faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
TGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZVGNX51.121.20
+2.40%
Zevenbergen Genea Investor
BRSDX16.480.29
+1.79%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq A
FMBRX17.490.13
+0.75%
Franklin Mutual Beacon R6
GGIPX21.81N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps P
FSEAX49.85-0.32
-0.64%
Fidelity Emerging Asia

TGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGS has been closely correlated with YPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGS jumps, then YPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGS
1D Price
Change %
TGS100%
+2.53%
YPF - TGS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
EC - TGS
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
E - TGS
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
EQNR - TGS
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
BP - TGS
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
More