Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAASX vs RPMGX
EAASX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts EAASX vs RPMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap A
Price$33.10
Change-$0.13 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.18B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$103.77
Change-$0.29 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.45B
EAASX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAASX vs. RPMGX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAASX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. EAASX (13.2B). EAASX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . EAASX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: EAASX (22 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). EAASX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. EAASX (9.00). EAASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: EAASX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.97 vs. EAASX (-10.95). EAASX return over 5 years is better than : 0.82 vs. RPMGX (-2.75).
| EAASX | RPMGX | EAASX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.75 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.75 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.583 | 4.051 | -113% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 26.5B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.95 | -4.97 | 220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.26 | 17.64 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.82 | -2.75 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.77 | 30.03 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers