Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAASX vs RPMGX
EAASX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts EAASX vs RPMGX
EAASX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAASX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAASX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 22.5B vs. EAASX (8.97B). EAASX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . EAASX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: EAASX (23 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). EAASX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.77). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. EAASX (13.00). EAASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: EAASX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.05 vs. EAASX (-13.43). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : -19.79 vs. EAASX (-22.77).
| EAASX | RPMGX | EAASX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.77 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.77 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.061 | 1.944 | -209% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.97B | 22.5B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.43 | -0.05 | 26,647% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.03 | 2.23 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.77 | -19.79 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.41 | 37.09 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement