Ad is loading...
EAASX vs RPTIX
EAASX vs RPTIX Comparison
Open Charts EAASX vs RPTIX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap A
Price$32.19
Change-$1.43 (-4.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.22B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$89.36
Change-$4.77 (-5.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.39B
EAASX vs RPTIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAASX vs. RPTIX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAASX is a Buy and RPTIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. EAASX (14.2B). RPTIX pays higher dividends than EAASX: RPTIX (0.06) vs EAASX (0.00). EAASX was incepted earlier than RPTIX: EAASX (21 years) vs RPTIX (10 years). EAASX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). RPTIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. EAASX (9.00). EAASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: EAASX (1000) vs RPTIX (500000). EAASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.67 vs. RPTIX (-12.24). EAASX return over 5 years is better than : 48.24 vs. RPTIX (34.95).
| EAASX | RPTIX | EAASX / RPTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.63 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.63 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.084 | -5.908 | 52% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.2B | 27.4B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.67 | -12.24 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.41 | -9.93 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.24 | 34.95 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers