Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EAASX vs RRMGX
EAASX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts EAASX vs RRMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap A
Price$34.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.22B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$88.39
Change+$0.29 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.77B
EAASX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAASX vs. RRMGX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAASX is a Buy and RRMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.8B vs. EAASX (14.2B). EAASX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . EAASX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: EAASX (22 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than EAASX (1.12). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. EAASX (9.00). EAASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: EAASX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). EAASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.59 vs. RRMGX (-4.49). EAASX return over 5 years is better than : 18.40 vs. RRMGX (4.32).
| EAASX | RRMGX | EAASX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.29 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.29 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.874 | 0.535 | -351% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.2B | 27.8B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.59 | -4.49 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.54 | 9.77 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.40 | 4.32 | 426% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.86 | 13.89 | 244% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement