EAATF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
2.67M
ECLMF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.01 (+7.14%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
32.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EAATF vs ECLMF

Header iconEAATF vs ECLMF Comparison
Open Charts EAATF vs ECLMFBanner chart's image
Earthworks Industries
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$60K
Capitalization2.67M
Ecolomondo
Price$0.15
Change+$0.01 (+7.14%)
Volume$4.5K
Capitalization32.73M
EAATF vs ECLMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAATF vs. ECLMF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAATF is a Hold and ECLMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (EAATF: $0.02 vs. ECLMF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: EAATF and ECLMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAATF: 610% vs. ECLMF: 190%
Market capitalization -- EAATF: $2.67M vs. ECLMF: $32.73M
EAATF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $2.67M. ECLMF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $32.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $90.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAATF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileECLMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EAATF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ECLMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EAATF and ECLMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAATF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ECLMF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAATF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • ECLMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ECLMF is a better buy in the short-term than EAATF.

Price Growth

EAATF (@Environmental Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ECLMF (@Environmental Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.76% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECLMF($32.7M) has a higher market cap than EAATF($2.67M). ECLMF YTD gains are higher at: 163.590 vs. EAATF (-40.236). ECLMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.29M vs. EAATF (-14.27M). ECLMF has more cash in the bank: 449K vs. EAATF (50.6K). EAATF has less debt than ECLMF: EAATF (1.77M) vs ECLMF (45.9M). ECLMF has higher revenues than EAATF: ECLMF (701K) vs EAATF (0).
EAATFECLMFEAATF / ECLMF
Capitalization2.67M32.7M8%
EBITDA-14.27M-2.29M624%
Gain YTD-40.236163.590-25%
P/E Ratio2.26N/A-
Revenue0701K-
Total Cash50.6K449K11%
Total Debt1.77M45.9M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAATF vs ECLMF: Fundamental Ratings
EAATF
ECLMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9039
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EAATF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECLMF (94). This means that EAATF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

EAATF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ECLMF (100). This means that EAATF’s stock grew similarly to ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

EAATF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ECLMF (100). This means that EAATF’s stock grew similarly to ECLMF’s over the last 12 months.

ECLMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAATF (90). This means that ECLMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

ECLMF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EAATF (100). This means that ECLMF’s stock grew similarly to EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EAATFECLMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KPEA0.08N/A
N/A
Kun Peng International Ltd.
EUSP0.01N/A
N/A
Eurosite Power Inc.
UNBLF100.00N/A
N/A
Unibail-Rodamco SE
VSBC1.00N/A
N/A
VitaSpring Biomedical Co. Ltd.
BROGF3.20-0.30
-8.57%
Brooge Energy Limited

EAATF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EAATF and SNRG have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EAATF and SNRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAATF
1D Price
Change %
EAATF100%
N/A
SNRG - EAATF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
GCEI - EAATF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSKIF - EAATF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCPJ - EAATF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ECLMF - EAATF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ECLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECLMF and ANRGF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECLMF and ANRGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECLMF
1D Price
Change %
ECLMF100%
N/A
ANRGF - ECLMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+9.49%
SCPJ - ECLMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMRAF - ECLMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EAATF - ECLMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SENR - ECLMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More