EAATF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.02 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
26.5M
GCEI
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
981.8K
Interact to see
Advertisement

EAATF vs GCEI

Header iconEAATF vs GCEI Comparison
Open Charts EAATF vs GCEIBanner chart's image
Earthworks Industries
Price$0.02
Change-$0.02 (-50.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization26.5M
Global Clean Energy
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$1.51M
Capitalization981.8K
EAATF vs GCEI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCEI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAATF vs. GCEI commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAATF is a StrongBuy and GCEI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (EAATF: $0.02 vs. GCEI: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: EAATF and GCEI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAATF: 20% vs. GCEI: 219%
Market capitalization -- EAATF: $26.5M vs. GCEI: $981.8K
EAATF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $26.5M. GCEI’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $981.8K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAATF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGCEI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EAATF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GCEI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAATF is a better buy in the long-term than GCEI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAATF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCEI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAATF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GCEI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EAATF is a better buy in the short-term than GCEI.

Price Growth

EAATF (@Environmental Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GCEI (@Environmental Services) price change was -1.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-1.71% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAATF($26.5M) has a higher market cap than GCEI($982K). GCEI YTD gains are higher at: -33.590 vs. EAATF (-35.754). GCEI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -473.53K vs. EAATF (-1.25M). EAATF has more cash in the bank: 782K vs. GCEI (34.8K). GCEI has less debt than EAATF: GCEI (574K) vs EAATF (1M). GCEI has higher revenues than EAATF: GCEI (198K) vs EAATF (0).
EAATFGCEIEAATF / GCEI
Capitalization26.5M982K2,699%
EBITDA-1.25M-473.53K263%
Gain YTD-35.754-33.590106%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0198K-
Total Cash782K34.8K2,247%
Total Debt1M574K174%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAATF vs GCEI: Fundamental Ratings
EAATF
GCEI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
189
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
27100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9595
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GCEI's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as EAATF (21). This means that GCEI’s stock grew similarly to EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

GCEI's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EAATF (100). This means that GCEI’s stock grew similarly to EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

EAATF's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCEI (100). This means that EAATF’s stock grew significantly faster than GCEI’s over the last 12 months.

EAATF's Price Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as GCEI (95). This means that EAATF’s stock grew similarly to GCEI’s over the last 12 months.

EAATF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GCEI (100). This means that EAATF’s stock grew similarly to GCEI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EAATFGCEI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCEI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KLKLF0.100.01
+11.11%
KIRKLAND LAKE DISCOVERIES CORP.
AVVIY17.800.02
+0.11%
Aviva Plc
NRDXF23.45N/A
N/A
NORDEX SE
LMGHF2.10N/A
N/A
VICTORY PARTN VIII NORWAY HLDG AS
EMPPF0.19N/A
-1.54%
EMP Metals Corp.

EAATF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EAATF and SNRG have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EAATF and SNRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAATF
1D Price
Change %
EAATF100%
N/A
SNRG - EAATF
9%
Poorly correlated
-16.49%
GCEI - EAATF
8%
Poorly correlated
+19.08%
DSKIF - EAATF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCPJ - EAATF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ECLMF - EAATF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GCEI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCEI and SCPJ have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCEI and SCPJ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCEI
1D Price
Change %
GCEI100%
+19.08%
SCPJ - GCEI
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EAATF - GCEI
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSKIF - GCEI
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SECYF - GCEI
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.70%
SNRG - GCEI
1%
Poorly correlated
-16.49%
More