EAATF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
2.67M
GCEI
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
35.27M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EAATF vs GCEI

Header iconEAATF vs GCEI Comparison
Open Charts EAATF vs GCEIBanner chart's image
Earthworks Industries
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$60K
Capitalization2.67M
Global Clean Energy
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.08M
Capitalization35.27M
EAATF vs GCEI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCEI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAATF vs. GCEI commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAATF is a Hold and GCEI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (EAATF: $0.02 vs. GCEI: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: EAATF and GCEI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAATF: 610% vs. GCEI: 125%
Market capitalization -- EAATF: $2.67M vs. GCEI: $35.27M
EAATF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $2.67M. GCEI’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $35.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $90.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAATF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGCEI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EAATF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GCEI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EAATF and GCEI are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAATF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCEI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAATF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GCEI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCEI is a better buy in the short-term than EAATF.

Price Growth

EAATF (@Environmental Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GCEI (@Environmental Services) price change was +7.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.62% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCEI($35.3M) has a higher market cap than EAATF($2.67M). GCEI YTD gains are higher at: -28.205 vs. EAATF (-40.236).
EAATFGCEIEAATF / GCEI
Capitalization2.67M35.3M8%
EBITDA-14.27MN/A-
Gain YTD-40.236-28.205143%
P/E Ratio2.26N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash50.6KN/A-
Total Debt1.77MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAATF vs GCEI: Fundamental Ratings
EAATF
GCEI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9012
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9087
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GCEI's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as EAATF (43). This means that GCEI’s stock grew similarly to EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

GCEI's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EAATF (100). This means that GCEI’s stock grew similarly to EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

GCEI's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EAATF (100). This means that GCEI’s stock grew similarly to EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

GCEI's Price Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as EAATF (90). This means that GCEI’s stock grew similarly to EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

GCEI's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EAATF (100). This means that GCEI’s stock grew similarly to EAATF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EAATFGCEI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EAATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCEI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JBARF74.983.36
+4.70%
Julius Baer Group Ltd.
EIHDF0.96N/A
N/A
888 Holdings plc.
KMSTF5.06N/A
N/A
KADIMASTEM LTD.
GCWOF9.13N/A
N/A
Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua SAB de CV
FRTN0.05N/A
-8.53%
Fortran Corp.

EAATF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EAATF and SNRG have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EAATF and SNRG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAATF
1D Price
Change %
EAATF100%
N/A
SNRG - EAATF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
GCEI - EAATF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSKIF - EAATF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCPJ - EAATF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ECLMF - EAATF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GCEI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCEI and SCPJ have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCEI and SCPJ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCEI
1D Price
Change %
GCEI100%
N/A
SCPJ - GCEI
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EAATF - GCEI
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSKIF - GCEI
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SECYF - GCEI
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
SNRG - GCEI
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
More