Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EABLX vs FFRCX
EABLX vs FFRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EABLX vs. FFRCX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EABLX is a Hold and FFRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRCX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. EABLX (3.93B). EABLX (6.79) and FFRCX (6.53) have matching dividends . EABLX was incepted earlier than FFRCX: EABLX (25 years) vs FFRCX (25 years). FFRCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than EABLX (1.06). FFRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. EABLX (31.00). FFRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EABLX: FFRCX (0) vs EABLX (1000). FFRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.78 vs. EABLX (4.03). FFRCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.13 vs. EABLX (28.85).
| EABLX | FFRCX | EABLX / FFRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.77 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.77 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.084 | 2.878 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93B | 15.2B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.79 | 6.53 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.03 | 4.78 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.40 | 25.85 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | 31.13 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.60 | 48.83 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement