Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EABLX vs PFFRX
EABLX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EABLX vs. PFFRX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EABLX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. EABLX (3.93B). PFFRX pays higher dividends than EABLX: PFFRX (7.28) vs EABLX (6.79). EABLX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: EABLX (25 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). EABLX (1.06) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.69). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.30 vs. EABLX (31.00). EABLX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: EABLX (1000) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.89 vs. EABLX (4.03). PFFRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.84 vs. EABLX (28.85).
| EABLX | PFFRX | EABLX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.69 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.69 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.084 | 4.612 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93B | 5.21B | 75% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.79 | 7.28 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.03 | 6.89 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.40 | 31.64 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | 36.84 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.60 | 64.48 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement