Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACAX vs FCCIX
EACAX vs FCCIX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs FCCIX
Eaton Vance CA Municipal Opportunities A
Price$9.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets979.64M
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc C
Price$10.82
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
EACAX vs FCCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. FCCIX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and FCCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCIX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. EACAX (980M). EACAX pays higher dividends than FCCIX: EACAX (3.56) vs FCCIX (2.69). EACAX was incepted earlier than FCCIX: EACAX (31 years) vs FCCIX (22 years). FCCIX (1.21) is less costly to investors than EACAX (0.75). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FCCIX (16.05). EACAX (1000) and FCCIX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.19 vs. EACAX (-0.86). EACAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.34 vs. FCCIX (-4.30).
| EACAX | FCCIX | EACAX / FCCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.14 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.21 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.933 | -0.052 | 3,728% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 980M | 1.31B | 75% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.56 | 2.69 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.86 | 0.19 | -452% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.96 | 2.29 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.34 | -4.30 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.39 | -0.67 | -1,393% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement