Ad is loading...
EACAX vs FCCQX
EACAX vs FCCQX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs FCCQX
Eaton Vance CA Municipal Opportunities A
Price$10.18
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc A
Price$11.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
EACAX vs FCCQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. FCCQX commentary
Nov 14, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and FCCQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCQX has more cash in the bank: 1.35B vs. EACAX (942M). EACAX pays higher dividends than FCCQX: EACAX (3.26) vs FCCQX (2.81). EACAX was incepted earlier than FCCQX: EACAX (30 years) vs FCCQX (6 years). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FCCQX (18.50). EACAX (1000) and FCCQX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. FCCQX (6.07). EACAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.56 vs. FCCQX (-1.32).
| EACAX | FCCQX | EACAX / FCCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.328 | 1.654 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 942M | 1.35B | 70% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 2.81 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.43 | 6.07 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.40 | -3.37 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.56 | -1.32 | -193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...