Ad is loading...
EACAX vs FCCQX
EACAX vs FCCQX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs FCCQX
Eaton Vance CA Municipal Opportunities A
Price$9.85
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets973.24M
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc A
Price$10.77
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
EACAX vs FCCQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. FCCQX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and FCCQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCQX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. EACAX (973M). EACAX pays higher dividends than FCCQX: EACAX (3.41) vs FCCQX (3.04). EACAX was incepted earlier than FCCQX: EACAX (31 years) vs FCCQX (7 years). FCCQX (0.82) is less costly to investors than EACAX (0.75). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FCCQX (16.05). EACAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FCCQX (2%) vs FCCQX (2%). EACAX (1000) and FCCQX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCCQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.81 vs. EACAX (1.53). EACAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.29 vs. FCCQX (0.05).
| EACAX | FCCQX | EACAX / FCCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.74 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.82 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.667 | -0.641 | 260% |
| Front Load | 3% | 2% | 144% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 973M | 1.32B | 74% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 3.04 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.53 | 1.81 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.08 | 4.66 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.29 | 0.05 | 6,468% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers