Ad is loading...
EACAX vs FRCZX
EACAX vs FRCZX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs FRCZX
Eaton Vance CA Municipal Opportunities A
Price$9.87
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc Adv
Price$10.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
EACAX vs FRCZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. FRCZX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and FRCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRCZX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. EACAX (1B). EACAX (3.36) and FRCZX (3.25) have matching dividends . EACAX was incepted earlier than FRCZX: EACAX (31 years) vs FRCZX (17 years). EACAX (0.75) is less costly to investors than FRCZX (0.57). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. FRCZX (16.05). EACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRCZX: EACAX (1000) vs FRCZX (100000). FRCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.58 vs. EACAX (1.03). EACAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.57 vs. FRCZX (0.23).
| EACAX | FRCZX | EACAX / FRCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.49 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.57 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.352 | -1.208 | 195% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 1.32B | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 3.25 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.03 | 1.58 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.12 | 4.48 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.57 | 0.23 | 1,106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.42 | -0.05 | -16,144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...