Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACAX vs GCMFX
EACAX vs GCMFX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs GCMFX
Eaton Vance CA Municipal Opportunities A
Price$10.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
PIMCO Ca Muni Oppc Val Instl
Price$9.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets216.36M
EACAX vs GCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. GCMFX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and GCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EACAX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. GCMFX (216M). EACAX (3.41) and GCMFX (3.40) have matching dividends . EACAX was incepted earlier than GCMFX: EACAX (32 years) vs GCMFX (11 years). EACAX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GCMFX (0.60). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. GCMFX (20.00). EACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCMFX: EACAX (1000) vs GCMFX (250000). GCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.46 vs. EACAX (2.33). GCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 7.16 vs. EACAX (1.47).
| EACAX | GCMFX | EACAX / GCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.60 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.60 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.377 | 2.502 | 95% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 216M | 471% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 3.40 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.33 | 2.46 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.51 | 11.45 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.47 | 7.16 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.51 | 21.89 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement