Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACAX vs GCMFX
EACAX vs GCMFX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs GCMFX
Eaton Vance CA Municipal Opportunities A
Price$10.02
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets961.61M
PIMCO Ca Muni Oppc Val Instl
Price$9.68
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net AssetsN/A
EACAX vs GCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. GCMFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and GCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EACAX (3.53) and GCMFX (3.49) have matching dividends . EACAX was incepted earlier than GCMFX: EACAX (31 years) vs GCMFX (11 years). EACAX (0.75) is less costly to investors than GCMFX (0.60). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. GCMFX (20.00). EACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCMFX: EACAX (1000) vs GCMFX (250000). EACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.70 vs. GCMFX (0.36). GCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 6.32 vs. EACAX (1.38).
| EACAX | GCMFX | EACAX / GCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.60 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.60 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.975 | 0.866 | 113% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 962M | N/A | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.53 | 3.49 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.70 | 0.36 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.12 | 9.59 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.38 | 6.32 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.07 | 20.60 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement