Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACAX vs PCFCX
EACAX vs PCFCX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs PCFCX
Eaton Vance CA Municipal Opportunities A
Price$9.76
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets979.64M
PIMCO CA Intermediate Muni Bd C
Price$9.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.96M
EACAX vs PCFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. PCFCX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and PCFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EACAX has more cash in the bank: 980M vs. PCFCX (206M). EACAX pays higher dividends than PCFCX: EACAX (3.56) vs PCFCX (2.40). EACAX was incepted earlier than PCFCX: EACAX (31 years) vs PCFCX (16 years). PCFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than EACAX (0.75). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. PCFCX (58.00). EACAX (1000) and PCFCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PCFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.64 vs. EACAX (-1.44). EACAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.51 vs. PCFCX (-3.62).
| EACAX | PCFCX | EACAX / PCFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.52 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.52 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.933 | -0.018 | 10,568% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 980M | 206M | 476% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.56 | 2.40 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.44 | -0.64 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.37 | 3.75 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.51 | -3.62 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.39 | 7.08 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement