Ad is loading...
EACAX vs PCFCX
EACAX vs PCFCX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs PCFCX
Eaton Vance CA Municipal Opportunities A
Price$9.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
PIMCO CA Intermediate Muni Bd C
Price$9.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.85M
EACAX vs PCFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. PCFCX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and PCFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EACAX has more cash in the bank: 1B vs. PCFCX (198M). EACAX pays higher dividends than PCFCX: EACAX (3.41) vs PCFCX (2.38). EACAX was incepted earlier than PCFCX: EACAX (31 years) vs PCFCX (16 years). PCFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than EACAX (0.75). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. PCFCX (35.00). EACAX (1000) and PCFCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.64 vs. PCFCX (1.16). EACAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.29 vs. PCFCX (0.17).
| EACAX | PCFCX | EACAX / PCFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.52 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.52 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.667 | -0.630 | 265% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 198M | 507% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 2.38 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.64 | 1.16 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.98 | 4.82 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.29 | 0.17 | 1,915% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.28 | 6.10 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...