Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACAX vs PCFCX
EACAX vs PCFCX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs PCFCX
Eaton Vance CA Municipal Opportunities A
Price$9.77
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets965.01M
PIMCO CA Intermediate Muni Bd C
Price$9.15
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.44M
EACAX vs PCFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. PCFCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and PCFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EACAX has more cash in the bank: 965M vs. PCFCX (204M). EACAX pays higher dividends than PCFCX: EACAX (3.45) vs PCFCX (2.40). EACAX was incepted earlier than PCFCX: EACAX (31 years) vs PCFCX (16 years). PCFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than EACAX (0.75). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. PCFCX (35.00). EACAX (1000) and PCFCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PCFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.02 vs. EACAX (-0.37). EACAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.78 vs. PCFCX (-2.92).
| EACAX | PCFCX | EACAX / PCFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.52 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.52 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.376 | -0.856 | 278% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 965M | 204M | 473% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.45 | 2.40 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.37 | -0.02 | 1,623% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.59 | 5.72 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.78 | -2.92 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.02 | 6.51 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers