Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACAX vs PCFCX
EACAX vs PCFCX Comparison
Open Charts EACAX vs PCFCX
Eaton Vance CA Municipal Opportunities A
Price$9.76
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets973.24M
PIMCO CA Intermediate Muni Bd C
Price$9.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.43M
EACAX vs PCFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACAX vs. PCFCX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACAX is a Hold and PCFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EACAX has more cash in the bank: 973M vs. PCFCX (208M). EACAX pays higher dividends than PCFCX: EACAX (3.41) vs PCFCX (2.38). EACAX was incepted earlier than PCFCX: EACAX (31 years) vs PCFCX (16 years). PCFCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than EACAX (0.75). EACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 173.00 vs. PCFCX (35.00). EACAX (1000) and PCFCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EACAX (0.50) and PCFCX (0.50) have marching annual gain over last year. EACAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.24 vs. PCFCX (-2.49).
| EACAX | PCFCX | EACAX / PCFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.52 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.52 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.763 | -1.387 | 199% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 973M | 208M | 468% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 2.38 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.50 | 0.50 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.10 | 4.59 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.24 | -2.49 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.49 | 5.94 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers