It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EACO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePGNT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EACO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGNT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
EACO (@Electronics/Appliance Stores) experienced а -4.11% price change this week, while PGNT (@Electronics/Appliance Stores) price change was -2.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliance Stores industry was +1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.51%.
The electronics/appliance stores industry includes companies that sell consumer electronics such as computers, stereo components, software, TVs, and appliances such as those for cooking and cleaning. Some companies also operate stores that rent and sell pre-recorded CDs and DVDs. Best Buy Co., Inc., Conn’s, Inc., Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores Inc. and Trans World Entertainment Corp. are some of the largest companies in this space.
EACO | PGNT | EACO / PGNT | |
Capitalization | 340M | 7.88M | 4,314% |
EBITDA | 42.9M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 91.781 | -50.111 | -183% |
P/E Ratio | 11.57 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 402M | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 29.3M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 11.6M | N/A | - |
EACO | PGNT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 99 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PGNT's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as EACO (57). This means that PGNT’s stock grew similarly to EACO’s over the last 12 months.
EACO's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PGNT (75). This means that EACO’s stock grew significantly faster than PGNT’s over the last 12 months.
PGNT's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EACO (42). This means that PGNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than EACO’s over the last 12 months.
EACO's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGNT (93). This means that EACO’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGNT’s over the last 12 months.
EACO's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as PGNT (64). This means that EACO’s stock grew similarly to PGNT’s over the last 12 months.
EACO | PGNT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago58% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago57% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago37% | 2 days ago62% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago41% | 2 days ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago40% | 2 days ago59% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago50% | 24 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago41% | 2 days ago61% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EACO and RXLSF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EACO and RXLSF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EACO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EACO | 100% | -1.41% | ||
RXLSF - EACO | 6% Poorly correlated | +9.76% | ||
SPRS - EACO | 5% Poorly correlated | -6.00% | ||
RXEEY - EACO | 2% Poorly correlated | +2.72% | ||
IZM - EACO | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
SKSJF - EACO | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PGNT and SPRS have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGNT and SPRS's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PGNT | 100% | +2.27% | ||
SPRS - PGNT | 12% Poorly correlated | -6.00% | ||
RXLSF - PGNT | 12% Poorly correlated | +9.76% | ||
SKSJF - PGNT | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
EACO - PGNT | -1% Poorly correlated | -1.41% | ||
RXEEY - PGNT | -1% Poorly correlated | +2.72% | ||
More |