Ad is loading...
EACPX vs RGACX
EACPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EACPX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr A
Price$54.82
Change+$0.34 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.93M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$68.46
Change+$0.70 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.25B
EACPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACPX vs. RGACX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACPX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. EACPX (153M). RGACX pays higher dividends than EACPX: RGACX (0.09) vs EACPX (0.00). EACPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EACPX (25 years) vs RGACX (23 years). EACPX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. EACPX (8.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EACPX: RGACX (250) vs EACPX (1000). EACPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.54 vs. RGACX (0.34). EACPX return over 5 years is better than : 100.44 vs. RGACX (68.49).
| EACPX | RGACX | EACPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.94 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.94 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.173 | -4.903 | 146% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153M | 275B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.54 | 0.34 | 745% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.40 | 5.90 | 345% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.44 | 68.49 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.06 | 58.32 | 280% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...