Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACPX vs RGACX
EACPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EACPX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr A
Price$60.50
Change-$1.29 (-2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.84M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$79.55
Change-$1.33 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.81B
EACPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACPX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACPX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 320B vs. EACPX (156M). RGACX pays higher dividends than EACPX: RGACX (0.07) vs EACPX (0.00). EACPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EACPX (25 years) vs RGACX (23 years). EACPX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. EACPX (8.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EACPX: RGACX (250) vs EACPX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. EACPX (11.47). EACPX return over 5 years is better than : 58.80 vs. RGACX (40.59).
| EACPX | RGACX | EACPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.94 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.94 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.282 | 10.501 | 50% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 320B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 13.49 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.59 | 44.82 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.80 | 40.59 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 186.73 | 77.78 | 240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement