Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACPX vs RGACX
EACPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EACPX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr A
Price$62.22
Change+$0.38 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets166.9M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.12
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
EACPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACPX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACPX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. EACPX (167M). RGACX pays higher dividends than EACPX: RGACX (0.07) vs EACPX (0.00). EACPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EACPX (25 years) vs RGACX (24 years). EACPX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. EACPX (8.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EACPX: RGACX (250) vs EACPX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. EACPX (3.38). EACPX return over 5 years is better than : 45.27 vs. RGACX (32.00).
| EACPX | RGACX | EACPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.94 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.94 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.367 | 15.460 | 35% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 167M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.38 | 6.37 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.72 | 61.11 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.27 | 32.00 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.09 | 85.80 | 218% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement