Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACPX vs RGEBX
EACPX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts EACPX vs RGEBX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr A
Price$62.20
Change+$0.97 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.43M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.47
Change+$1.55 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.96B
EACPX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACPX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACPX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. EACPX (160M). EACPX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . EACPX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: EACPX (25 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). EACPX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. EACPX (8.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EACPX: RGEBX (250) vs EACPX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.78 vs. EACPX (9.78). EACPX return over 5 years is better than : 51.71 vs. RGEBX (38.26).
| EACPX | RGEBX | EACPX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.09 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.09 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.981 | 14.040 | 43% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.78 | 13.78 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.07 | 47.56 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.71 | 38.26 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 223.28 | 99.55 | 224% |