Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACPX vs RGEBX
EACPX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts EACPX vs RGEBX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr A
Price$63.83
Change+$0.36 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.41M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$85.25
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
EACPX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACPX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACPX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. EACPX (163M). EACPX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . EACPX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: EACPX (25 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). EACPX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. EACPX (8.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EACPX: RGEBX (250) vs EACPX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.02 vs. EACPX (9.87). EACPX return over 5 years is better than : 52.68 vs. RGEBX (41.09).
| EACPX | RGEBX | EACPX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.09 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.09 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.144 | 19.331 | 42% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163M | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.87 | 14.02 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.42 | 73.12 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.68 | 41.09 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 209.46 | 96.51 | 217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement