Ad is loading...
EAFAX vs EVBLX
EAFAX vs EVBLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EAFAX vs. EVBLX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAFAX is a Hold and EVBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAFAX has more cash in the bank: 5.57B vs. EVBLX (4.53B). EAFAX pays higher dividends than EVBLX: EAFAX (8.47) vs EVBLX (7.88). EAFAX was incepted earlier than EVBLX: EAFAX (17 years) vs EVBLX (22 years). EAFAX (2.67) is less costly to investors than EVBLX (1.06). EAFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. EVBLX (31.00). EAFAX (3%) and EVBLX (3%) have equivalent initial investment costs. EAFAX (1000) and EVBLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EAFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. EVBLX (5.10). EAFAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.15 vs. EVBLX (36.39).
| EAFAX | EVBLX | EAFAX / EVBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 1.06 | 252% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 1.06 | 252% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.898 | -0.761 | 118% |
| Front Load | 3% | 3% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.57B | 4.53B | 123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.47 | 7.88 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 5.10 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.90 | 17.73 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.15 | 36.39 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.26 | 47.05 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...