EAPIF
Price
$3.20
Change
+$0.11 (+3.56%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
361.01M
HLBBF
Price
$7.21
Change
-$0.29 (-3.87%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
6.81B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EAPIF vs HLBBF

Header iconEAPIF vs HLBBF Comparison
Open Charts EAPIF vs HLBBFBanner chart's image
EUROAPI SA
Price$3.20
Change+$0.11 (+3.56%)
Volume$101
Capitalization361.01M
H. Lundbeck A/S
Price$7.21
Change-$0.29 (-3.87%)
Volume$200
Capitalization6.81B
EAPIF vs HLBBF Comparison Chart in %
EAPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLBBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAPIF vs. HLBBF commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAPIF is a Hold and HLBBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (EAPIF: $3.20 vs. HLBBF: $7.21)
Brand notoriety: EAPIF and HLBBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAPIF: 27% vs. HLBBF: 13%
Market capitalization -- EAPIF: $361.01M vs. HLBBF: $6.81B
EAPIF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $361.01M. HLBBF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $6.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $63.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $4.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAPIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHLBBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EAPIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HLBBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EAPIF and HLBBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAPIF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLBBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAPIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HLBBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLBBF is a better buy in the short-term than EAPIF.

Price Growth

EAPIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HLBBF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+1.16% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLBBF($6.81B) has a higher market cap than EAPIF($361M). HLBBF has higher P/E ratio than EAPIF: HLBBF (13.06) vs EAPIF (7.92). HLBBF YTD gains are higher at: 17.236 vs. EAPIF (6.667). HLBBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.82B vs. EAPIF (-37.9M). HLBBF has more cash in the bank: 2.65B vs. EAPIF (57.8M). EAPIF has less debt than HLBBF: EAPIF (68.4M) vs HLBBF (13.6B). HLBBF has higher revenues than EAPIF: HLBBF (23.5B) vs EAPIF (883M).
EAPIFHLBBFEAPIF / HLBBF
Capitalization361M6.81B5%
EBITDA-37.9M4.82B-1%
Gain YTD6.66717.23639%
P/E Ratio7.9213.0661%
Revenue883M23.5B4%
Total Cash57.8M2.65B2%
Total Debt68.4M13.6B1%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EAPIFHLBBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EAPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLBBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UWM48.090.96
+2.04%
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
AVUQ60.140.63
+1.05%
Avantis U.S. Quality ETF
FLEU32.400.20
+0.63%
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
GENT10.370.01
+0.10%
Genter Capital Taxable Qual Interm ETF
ILCV90.500.04
+0.04%
iShares Morningstar Value ETF

EAPIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EAPIF and HLN have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EAPIF and HLN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EAPIF
1D Price
Change %
EAPIF100%
N/A
HLN - EAPIF
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
HLNCF - EAPIF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
IXHL - EAPIF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
AKAN - EAPIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.26%
ALVO - EAPIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
More

HLBBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLBBF and HYEX have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLBBF and HYEX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLBBF
1D Price
Change %
HLBBF100%
N/A
HYEX - HLBBF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.38%
HLUBF - HLBBF
18%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
HLN - HLBBF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
HLNCF - HLBBF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
EAPIF - HLBBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More