EAT
Price
$133.03
Change
-$3.93 (-2.87%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.92B
33 days until earnings call
SHAK
Price
$94.21
Change
-$1.07 (-1.12%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.79B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EAT vs SHAK

Header iconEAT vs SHAK Comparison
Open Charts EAT vs SHAKBanner chart's image
Brinker International
Price$133.03
Change-$3.93 (-2.87%)
Volume$1.3M
Capitalization5.92B
Shake Shack
Price$94.21
Change-$1.07 (-1.12%)
Volume$1.03M
Capitalization3.79B
EAT vs SHAK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EAT vs. SHAK commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EAT is a Buy and SHAK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (EAT: $133.03 vs. SHAK: $94.21)
Brand notoriety: EAT: Not notable vs. SHAK: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EAT: 97% vs. SHAK: 71%
Market capitalization -- EAT: $5.92B vs. SHAK: $3.79B
EAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $5.92B. SHAK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $3.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $215.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EAT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than SHAK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SHAK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the short-term than SHAK.

Price Growth

EAT (@Restaurants) experienced а -4.21% price change this week, while SHAK (@Restaurants) price change was -4.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

EAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

SHAK is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.37% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAT($5.92B) has a higher market cap than SHAK($3.79B). SHAK has higher P/E ratio than EAT: SHAK (200.45) vs EAT (15.99). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 0.559 vs. SHAK (-27.419). EAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 720M vs. SHAK (137M). SHAK has more cash in the bank: 337M vs. EAT (18.9M). SHAK has less debt than EAT: SHAK (838M) vs EAT (1.69B). EAT has higher revenues than SHAK: EAT (5.38B) vs SHAK (1.32B).
EATSHAKEAT / SHAK
Capitalization5.92B3.79B156%
EBITDA720M137M526%
Gain YTD0.559-27.419-2%
P/E Ratio15.99200.458%
Revenue5.38B1.32B407%
Total Cash18.9M337M6%
Total Debt1.69B838M202%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EAT vs SHAK: Fundamental Ratings
EAT
SHAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5558
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3277
SMR RATING
1..100
1187
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6064
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8228
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EAT's Valuation (63) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHAK (96). This means that EAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHAK (77). This means that EAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (11) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for SHAK (87). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SHAK (64). This means that EAT’s stock grew similarly to SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAT (82). This means that SHAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EATSHAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BUFIX23.78N/A
N/A
Buffalo International
JHTRX20.43N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 3 R6
JFDRX19.28N/A
N/A
JHancock Financial Industries R6
CGCYX50.77N/A
N/A
Columbia Greater China Inst3
RGBGX40.65-0.22
-0.54%
American Funds Global Balanced R6

SHAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHAK has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHAK jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHAK
1D Price
Change %
SHAK100%
-1.12%
CAKE - SHAK
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
FRSH - SHAK
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.58%
EAT - SHAK
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
TXRH - SHAK
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
CAVA - SHAK
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
More