Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
15 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EATZ vs FAT
EATZ vs FAT Comparison
Open Charts EATZ vs FAT
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
Price$27.65
Change+$0.35 (+1.28%)
Volume$1.38K
Net Assets3.28M
EATZ vs FAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EATZ vs. FAT commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EATZ is a Hold and FAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT: Fundamental Ratings
FAT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 25 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EATZ | FAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 8 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EATZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EATZ and RICK have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EATZ and RICK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EATZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EATZ | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| RICK - EATZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +3.31% | ||
| TXRH - EATZ | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.24% | ||
| FAT - EATZ | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.28% | ||
| DASH - EATZ | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| WEN - EATZ | 7% Poorly correlated | +2.88% | ||
More | ||||
FAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAT has been loosely correlated with SBUX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAT jumps, then SBUX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAT | 100% | +2.28% | ||
| SBUX - FAT | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| GENK - FAT | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| DIN - FAT | 32% Poorly correlated | +6.24% | ||
| CNNE - FAT | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
| CAKE - FAT | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
More | ||||