Intraday BUY SELL Signals
124 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EATZ vs FAT
EATZ vs FAT Comparison
Open Charts EATZ vs FAT
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
Price$25.20
Change+$0.93 (+3.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91M
EATZ vs FAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EATZ vs. FAT commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EATZ is a Hold and FAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT: Fundamental Ratings
FAT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 28 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EATZ | FAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EATZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EATZ and RICK have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EATZ and RICK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EATZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EATZ | 100% | +3.72% | ||
| RICK - EATZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +11.61% | ||
| FAT - EATZ | 8% Poorly correlated | -41.56% | ||
| WEN - EATZ | 7% Poorly correlated | +5.34% | ||
| PZZA - EATZ | 7% Poorly correlated | +4.33% | ||
| RRGB - EATZ | 4% Poorly correlated | +4.49% | ||
More | ||||
FAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAT has been loosely correlated with GENK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAT jumps, then GENK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAT | 100% | -41.56% | ||
| GENK - FAT | 33% Loosely correlated | +3.75% | ||
| DIN - FAT | 31% Poorly correlated | +9.10% | ||
| SBUX - FAT | 29% Poorly correlated | +3.30% | ||
| BROS - FAT | 29% Poorly correlated | +7.80% | ||
| FWRG - FAT | 28% Poorly correlated | +8.76% | ||
More | ||||