Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EATZ vs IYC
EATZ vs IYC Comparison
Open Charts EATZ vs IYC
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
Price$27.10
Change-$0.18 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.29M
iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF
Price$103.35
Change+$0.28 (+0.27%)
Volume$2.35K
Net Assets1.91B
EATZ vs IYC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EATZ vs. IYC commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EATZ is a Hold and IYC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYC has more net assets: 1.91B vs. EATZ (3.29M). IYC has a higher annual dividend yield than EATZ: IYC (7.679) vs EATZ (-1.695). EATZ was incepted earlier than IYC: EATZ (4 years) vs IYC (25 years). IYC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than EATZ (0.99). EATZ has a higher turnover IYC (22.00) vs IYC (22.00).
| EATZ | IYC | EATZ / IYC | |
| Gain YTD | -1.695 | 7.679 | -22% |
| Net Assets | 3.29M | 1.91B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.39 | 254% |
| Turnover | 75.00 | 22.00 | 341% |
| Yield | 0.18 | 0.49 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EATZ | IYC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 84% | 10 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| FOREX / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AUDGBP | 0.49 | N/A | N/A |
| Australian Dollar - United Kingdom Pound | |||
| EURHKD | 9.11 | N/A | N/A |
| Euro - Hong Kong Dollar | |||
| HKDGBP | 0.10 | N/A | N/A |
| Hong Kong Dollar - United Kingdom Pound | |||
| NZDUSD | 0.58 | N/A | N/A |
| New Zealand Dollar - United States Dollar | |||
| CHFGBP | 0.93 | N/A | N/A |
| Switzerland Franc - United Kingdom Pound | |||
EATZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EATZ and SG have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EATZ and SG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EATZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EATZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| SG - EATZ | 14% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
| PBPB - EATZ | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| RICK - EATZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| SBUX - EATZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.00% | ||
| SYY - EATZ | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||
IYC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYC has been closely correlated with MAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYC jumps, then MAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y