Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EATZ vs IYC
EATZ vs IYC Comparison
Open Charts EATZ vs IYC
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
Price$29.17
Change-$0.49 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.56M
iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF
Price$95.84
Change-$1.18 (-1.22%)
Volume$39.45K
Net Assets1.47B
EATZ vs IYC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EATZ vs. IYC commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EATZ is a Hold and IYC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYC has more net assets: 1.47B vs. EATZ (3.56M). EATZ has a higher annual dividend yield than IYC: EATZ (4.508) vs IYC (-0.148). EATZ was incepted earlier than IYC: EATZ (4 years) vs IYC (25 years). IYC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than EATZ (0.99). EATZ has a higher turnover IYC (11.00) vs IYC (11.00).
| EATZ | IYC | EATZ / IYC | |
| Gain YTD | 4.508 | -0.148 | -3,040% |
| Net Assets | 3.56M | 1.47B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.39 | 254% |
| Turnover | 75.00 | 11.00 | 682% |
| Yield | 0.17 | 0.49 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IYC | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EATZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EATZ has been loosely correlated with PFGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EATZ jumps, then PFGC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EATZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EATZ | 100% | -1.56% | ||
| PFGC - EATZ | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| CAVA - EATZ | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.70% | ||
| PTLO - EATZ | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.46% | ||
| BROS - EATZ | 47% Loosely correlated | -4.57% | ||
| NATH - EATZ | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.13% | ||
More | ||||
IYC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYC has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYC jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y