Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EATZ vs IYC
EATZ vs IYC Comparison
Open Charts EATZ vs IYC
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
Price$28.70
Change+$0.78 (+2.79%)
Volume$601
Net Assets3.37M
iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF
Price$105.14
Change-$0.05 (-0.05%)
Volume$200
Net Assets1.75B
EATZ vs IYC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EATZ vs. IYC commentary
Sep 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EATZ is a Hold and IYC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYC has more net assets: 1.75B vs. EATZ (3.37M). IYC has a higher annual dividend yield than EATZ: IYC (9.752) vs EATZ (2.716). EATZ was incepted earlier than IYC: EATZ (4 years) vs IYC (25 years). IYC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than EATZ (0.99). EATZ has a higher turnover IYC (22.00) vs IYC (22.00).
| EATZ | IYC | EATZ / IYC | |
| Gain YTD | 2.716 | 9.752 | 28% |
| Net Assets | 3.37M | 1.75B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.39 | 254% |
| Turnover | 75.00 | 22.00 | 341% |
| Yield | 0.18 | 0.49 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EATZ | IYC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 84% | 9 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EATZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EATZ and WING have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EATZ and WING's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EATZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EATZ | 100% | +2.80% | ||
| WING - EATZ | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.12% | ||
| RICK - EATZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +3.63% | ||
| FAT - EATZ | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.62% | ||
| SYY - EATZ | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| LOCO - EATZ | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.17% | ||
More | ||||
IYC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYC has been closely correlated with MAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYC jumps, then MAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y