It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EBAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTSLA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EBAY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSLA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
EBAY (@Internet Retail) experienced а +2.51% price change this week, while TSLA (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +4.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +35.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +123.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +111.70%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.24%.
EBAY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
TSLA is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.
The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.
@Motor Vehicles (+0.67% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
EBAY | TSLA | EBAY / TSLA | |
Capitalization | 35.6B | 560B | 6% |
EBITDA | 2.96B | 14.8B | 20% |
Gain YTD | 25.715 | -23.044 | -112% |
P/E Ratio | 18.56 | 40.73 | 46% |
Revenue | 10.3B | 96.8B | 11% |
Total Cash | 4.79B | 29.1B | 16% |
Total Debt | 7.18B | 9.57B | 75% |
EBAY | TSLA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TSLA's Valuation (50) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as EBAY (77) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TSLA’s stock grew similarly to EBAY’s over the last 12 months.
TSLA's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as EBAY (48) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TSLA’s stock grew similarly to EBAY’s over the last 12 months.
EBAY's SMR Rating (27) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for TSLA (100) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that EBAY’s stock grew significantly faster than TSLA’s over the last 12 months.
EBAY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as TSLA (53) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that EBAY’s stock grew similarly to TSLA’s over the last 12 months.
EBAY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for TSLA (100) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that EBAY’s stock grew significantly faster than TSLA’s over the last 12 months.
EBAY | TSLA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 6 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 1 day ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 1 day ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 1 day ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 1 day ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 1 day ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago67% | 2 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago60% | 9 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 1 day ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 5 days ago78% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
CLOD | 34.09 | 0.13 | +0.38% |
Themes Cloud Computing ETF | |||
ETX | 18.02 | N/A | -0.01% |
EATON VANCE Municipal Income 2028 TERM TRUST | |||
THYF | 52.17 | -0.09 | -0.18% |
T. Rowe Price U.S. High Yield ETF | |||
HYRM | 23.28 | -0.06 | -0.28% |
Xtrackers Risk Managed USD HY Strat ETF | |||
SDY | 137.07 | -1.81 | -1.30% |
SPDR® S&P Dividend ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBAY has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EBAY jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EBAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EBAY | 100% | -0.53% | ||
CVNA - EBAY | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
ZLNDY - EBAY | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
CPNG - EBAY | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.70% | ||
CART - EBAY | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
BABA - EBAY | 27% Poorly correlated | +8.09% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSLA has been loosely correlated with RIVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TSLA jumps, then RIVN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TSLA | 100% | -1.93% | ||
RIVN - TSLA | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
STLA - TSLA | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.85% | ||
RNLSY - TSLA | 36% Loosely correlated | -4.64% | ||
VWAGY - TSLA | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
POAHY - TSLA | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More |