EBMT
Price
$17.05
Change
+$0.08 (+0.47%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
135.58M
21 days until earnings call
HFWA
Price
$24.39
Change
+$0.05 (+0.21%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
827.95M
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EBMT vs HFWA

Header iconEBMT vs HFWA Comparison
Open Charts EBMT vs HFWABanner chart's image
Eagle Bancorp Montana
Price$17.05
Change+$0.08 (+0.47%)
Volume$11.74K
Capitalization135.58M
Heritage Financial
Price$24.39
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
Volume$177.94K
Capitalization827.95M
EBMT vs HFWA Comparison Chart in %
EBMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBMT vs. HFWA commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBMT is a Hold and HFWA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (EBMT: $17.05 vs. HFWA: $24.39)
Brand notoriety: EBMT and HFWA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBMT: 54% vs. HFWA: 103%
Market capitalization -- EBMT: $135.58M vs. HFWA: $827.95M
EBMT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $135.58M. HFWA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $827.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBMT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHFWA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EBMT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HFWA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HFWA is a better buy in the long-term than EBMT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EBMT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFWA’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EBMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HFWA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EBMT is a better buy in the short-term than HFWA.

Price Growth

EBMT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.62% price change this week, while HFWA (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

EBMT is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

HFWA is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.29% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFWA($828M) has a higher market cap than EBMT($136M). HFWA has higher P/E ratio than EBMT: HFWA (17.02) vs EBMT (10.59). EBMT YTD gains are higher at: 14.098 vs. HFWA (2.591). HFWA has more cash in the bank: 89.1M vs. EBMT (21.4M). EBMT has less debt than HFWA: EBMT (179M) vs HFWA (285M). HFWA has higher revenues than EBMT: HFWA (226M) vs EBMT (84.5M).
EBMTHFWAEBMT / HFWA
Capitalization136M828M16%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.0982.591544%
P/E Ratio10.5917.0262%
Revenue84.5M226M37%
Total Cash21.4M89.1M24%
Total Debt179M285M63%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EBMT vs HFWA: Fundamental Ratings
EBMT
HFWA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7254
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8467
SMR RATING
1..100
5433
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8648
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EBMT's Valuation (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (51). This means that EBMT’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (84). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's SMR Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (54). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (57). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBMT (86). This means that HFWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBMTHFWA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EBMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSASF19.89N/A
N/A
Credit Saison Co., Ltd.
NXFNF3.65N/A
N/A
NEXT 15 GROUP PLC
RCIAF35.57N/A
N/A
Rogers Communications, Inc.
EFRGF0.37N/A
N/A
Pasofino Gold Ltd.
RTGC0.37N/A
-0.03%
Ridder Titan Genesis Corp.