EBMT
Price
$16.66
Change
+$0.06 (+0.36%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
102.37M
53 days until earnings call
PFS
Price
$16.75
Change
+$0.25 (+1.52%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.1B
49 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EBMT vs PFS

Header iconEBMT vs PFS Comparison
Open Charts EBMT vs PFSBanner chart's image
Eagle Bancorp Montana
Price$16.66
Change+$0.06 (+0.36%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization102.37M
Provident Financial Services
Price$16.75
Change+$0.25 (+1.52%)
Volume$7.52K
Capitalization1.1B
EBMT vs PFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
EBMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBMT vs. PFS commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBMT is a Buy and PFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (EBMT: $16.60 vs. PFS: $16.50)
Brand notoriety: EBMT and PFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBMT: 273% vs. PFS: 68%
Market capitalization -- EBMT: $102.37M vs. PFS: $1.1B
EBMT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $102.37M. PFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBMT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EBMT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than EBMT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EBMT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EBMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the short-term than EBMT.

Price Growth

EBMT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.35% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

EBMT is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

PFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.41% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($1.1B) has a higher market cap than EBMT($102M). EBMT has higher P/E ratio than PFS: EBMT (9.90) vs PFS (8.49). EBMT YTD gains are higher at: 10.133 vs. PFS (-10.230). PFS has more cash in the bank: 189M vs. EBMT (19.7M). EBMT has less debt than PFS: EBMT (235M) vs PFS (1.46B). PFS has higher revenues than EBMT: PFS (479M) vs EBMT (83.3M).
EBMTPFSEBMT / PFS
Capitalization102M1.1B9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.133-10.230-99%
P/E Ratio9.908.49117%
Revenue83.3M479M17%
Total Cash19.7M189M10%
Total Debt235M1.46B16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EBMT vs PFS: Fundamental Ratings
EBMT
PFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5352
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8152
SMR RATING
1..100
179
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5312
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EBMT's Valuation (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (30) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that EBMT’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (81) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (9) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (17) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBMT (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBMTPFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EBMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCGLY11.230.26
+2.37%
Societe Generale
SMMNY26.470.22
+0.82%
Siemens Healthineers AG
STBXF0.32N/A
N/A
Starbox Group Holdings Ltd
IKTSY64.49-0.51
-0.78%
Intertek Group Plc
NNXPF1.68-0.03
-1.58%
Nanoxplore Inc.

EBMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBMT has been loosely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EBMT jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBMT
1D Price
Change %
EBMT100%
-0.90%
STBA - EBMT
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
SHBI - EBMT
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
VBTX - EBMT
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
PFS - EBMT
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
UBSI - EBMT
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More

PFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with BHLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then BHLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFS
1D Price
Change %
PFS100%
-0.24%
BHLB - PFS
91%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
HOPE - PFS
90%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
PPBI - PFS
90%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
UBSI - PFS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
FFIN - PFS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
More