EBS
Price
$8.84
Change
+$0.02 (+0.23%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
471.62M
81 days until earnings call
MKGAF
Price
$133.25
Change
+$2.54 (+1.94%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
56.5B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EBS vs MKGAF

Header iconEBS vs MKGAF Comparison
Open Charts EBS vs MKGAFBanner chart's image
Emergent Biosolutions
Price$8.84
Change+$0.02 (+0.23%)
Volume$1.12M
Capitalization471.62M
Merck KGaA
Price$133.25
Change+$2.54 (+1.94%)
Volume$330
Capitalization56.5B
EBS vs MKGAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MKGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBS vs. MKGAF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBS is a Hold and MKGAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (EBS: $8.84 vs. MKGAF: $133.25)
Brand notoriety: EBS and MKGAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBS: 83% vs. MKGAF: 20%
Market capitalization -- EBS: $471.62M vs. MKGAF: $56.5B
EBS [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $471.62M. MKGAF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $56.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $68.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMKGAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MKGAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EBS is a better buy in the long-term than MKGAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EBS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MKGAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MKGAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EBS and MKGAF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EBS (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а +3.15% price change this week, while MKGAF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +8.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +4.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +78.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

EBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+4.25% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKGAF($56.5B) has a higher market cap than EBS($472M). MKGAF has higher P/E ratio than EBS: MKGAF (17.26) vs EBS (3.37). EBS YTD gains are higher at: -7.531 vs. MKGAF (-12.081). MKGAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.04B vs. EBS (105M). MKGAF has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. EBS (149M). EBS has less debt than MKGAF: EBS (666M) vs MKGAF (8.7B). MKGAF has higher revenues than EBS: MKGAF (21.3B) vs EBS (930M).
EBSMKGAFEBS / MKGAF
Capitalization472M56.5B1%
EBITDA105M6.04B2%
Gain YTD-7.531-12.08162%
P/E Ratio3.3717.2620%
Revenue930M21.3B4%
Total Cash149M1.62B9%
Total Debt666M8.7B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EBS vs MKGAF: Fundamental Ratings
EBS
MKGAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1854
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10099
SMR RATING
1..100
9569
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4691
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MKGAF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as EBS (54) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to EBS’s over the last 12 months.

MKGAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as EBS (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to EBS’s over the last 12 months.

MKGAF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as EBS (95) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that MKGAF’s stock grew similarly to EBS’s over the last 12 months.

EBS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as MKGAF (61) in the null industry. This means that EBS’s stock grew similarly to MKGAF’s over the last 12 months.

EBS's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MKGAF (91) in the null industry. This means that EBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MKGAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBSMKGAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MKGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GHAIX44.800.21
+0.47%
VanEck Global Resources Fund I
EHSTX26.61N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value A
ASQIX16.98N/A
N/A
American Century Small Company Inv
ODIIX132.01N/A
N/A
Invesco Discovery R6
MOGLX9.89N/A
N/A
Gabelli Media Mogul

MKGAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MKGAF has been loosely correlated with MKKGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MKGAF jumps, then MKKGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKGAF
1D Price
Change %
MKGAF100%
+1.94%
MKKGY - MKGAF
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.36%
AQST - MKGAF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INDV - MKGAF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
EVO - MKGAF
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
EBS - MKGAF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
More