Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EBSCX vs QGMNX
EBSCX vs QGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EBSCX vs. QGMNX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBSCX is a Hold and QGMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EBSCX has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. QGMNX (562M). QGMNX pays higher dividends than EBSCX: QGMNX (1.53) vs EBSCX (0.44). EBSCX was incepted earlier than QGMNX: EBSCX (12 years) vs QGMNX (11 years). EBSCX (2.84) is less costly to investors than QGMNX (1.94). QGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. EBSCX (0.00). EBSCX (2500) and QGMNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QGMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. EBSCX (-0.01). EBSCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.51 vs. QGMNX (19.16).
| EBSCX | QGMNX | EBSCX / QGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 1.70 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.84 | 1.94 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.109 | 4.671 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 562M | 348% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.53 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.01 | 6.59 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.80 | -1.24 | 789% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.51 | 19.16 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.15 | 10.72 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement