Ad is loading...
EBSCX vs QGMNX
EBSCX vs QGMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EBSCX vs. QGMNX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBSCX is a Hold and QGMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EBSCX has more cash in the bank: 1.72B vs. QGMNX (349M). QGMNX pays higher dividends than EBSCX: QGMNX (1.52) vs EBSCX (0.42). EBSCX was incepted earlier than QGMNX: EBSCX (11 years) vs QGMNX (11 years). EBSCX (2.84) is less costly to investors than QGMNX (1.74). QGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. EBSCX (0.00). EBSCX (2500) and QGMNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EBSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.02 vs. QGMNX (2.74). EBSCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.72 vs. QGMNX (25.30).
| EBSCX | QGMNX | EBSCX / QGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 1.49 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.84 | 1.74 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.882 | 6.263 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 349M | 492% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 1.52 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.02 | 2.74 | 329% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.26 | 12.98 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.72 | 25.30 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.04 | 12.52 | 8% |