Ad is loading...
EBSCX vs QGMNX
EBSCX vs QGMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EBSCX vs. QGMNX commentary
Feb 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBSCX is a Hold and QGMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EBSCX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. QGMNX (222M). QGMNX pays higher dividends than EBSCX: QGMNX (8.65) vs EBSCX (0.53). EBSCX was incepted earlier than QGMNX: EBSCX (11 years) vs QGMNX (11 years). QGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. EBSCX (0.00). EBSCX (2500) and QGMNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EBSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. QGMNX (0.76). EBSCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.60 vs. QGMNX (13.35).
| EBSCX | QGMNX | EBSCX / QGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.215 | 0.318 | 1,010% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 222M | 728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 8.65 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | 0.76 | 1,649% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.14 | 15.58 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.60 | 13.35 | 222% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.30 | 8.80 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers