Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EBSCX vs QGMNX
EBSCX vs QGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EBSCX vs. QGMNX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBSCX is a Hold and QGMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EBSCX has more cash in the bank: 1.96B vs. QGMNX (482M). QGMNX pays higher dividends than EBSCX: QGMNX (1.53) vs EBSCX (0.43). EBSCX was incepted earlier than QGMNX: EBSCX (11 years) vs QGMNX (11 years). EBSCX (2.84) is less costly to investors than QGMNX (1.94). QGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. EBSCX (0.00). EBSCX (2500) and QGMNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. EBSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.91 vs. QGMNX (-0.82). EBSCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.04 vs. QGMNX (20.13).
| EBSCX | QGMNX | EBSCX / QGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 1.70 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.84 | 1.94 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.111 | 3.928 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.96B | 482M | 407% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 1.53 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.91 | -0.82 | -233% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.10 | 4.96 | -123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.04 | 20.13 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.62 | 12.72 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement