EBTC
Price
$41.45
Change
+$1.38 (+3.44%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
318.88M
4 days until earnings call
FNRN
Price
$9.96
Change
-$0.03 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
135.57M
Ad is loading...

EBTC vs FNRN

Header iconEBTC vs FNRN Comparison
Open Charts EBTC vs FNRNBanner chart's image
Enterprise Ban
Price$41.45
Change+$1.38 (+3.44%)
Volume$52.07K
Capitalization318.88M
First Northern Community Ban
Price$9.96
Change-$0.03 (-0.30%)
Volume$737
Capitalization135.57M
EBTC vs FNRN Comparison Chart
Loading...
EBTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNRN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBTC vs. FNRN commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBTC is a Hold and FNRN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (EBTC: $41.45 vs. FNRN: $9.95)
Brand notoriety: EBTC and FNRN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBTC: 115% vs. FNRN: 13%
Market capitalization -- EBTC: $318.88M vs. FNRN: $135.57M
EBTC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $318.88M. FNRN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $135.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBTC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNRN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EBTC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FNRN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EBTC is a better buy in the long-term than FNRN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EBTC’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNRN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EBTC’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FNRN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNRN is a better buy in the short-term than EBTC.

Price Growth

EBTC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +11.33% price change this week, while FNRN (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

EBTC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

FNRN is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EBTC($319M) has a higher market cap than FNRN($136M). EBTC has higher P/E ratio than FNRN: EBTC (8.18) vs FNRN (7.33). EBTC YTD gains are higher at: 4.831 vs. FNRN (-0.350). FNRN has less debt than EBTC: FNRN (0) vs EBTC (110M). EBTC has higher revenues than FNRN: EBTC (171M) vs FNRN (65.4M).
EBTCFNRNEBTC / FNRN
Capitalization319M136M235%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.831-0.350-1,379%
P/E Ratio8.187.33112%
Revenue171M65.4M261%
Total Cash45.3MN/A-
Total Debt110M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EBTC vs FNRN: Fundamental Ratings
EBTC
FNRN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4770
SMR RATING
1..100
2337
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1740
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNRN's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as EBTC (70) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNRN’s stock grew similarly to EBTC’s over the last 12 months.

EBTC's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNRN (70) in the null industry. This means that EBTC’s stock grew similarly to FNRN’s over the last 12 months.

EBTC's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNRN (37) in the null industry. This means that EBTC’s stock grew similarly to FNRN’s over the last 12 months.

EBTC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNRN (51) in the null industry. This means that EBTC’s stock grew similarly to FNRN’s over the last 12 months.

EBTC's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNRN (40) in the null industry. This means that EBTC’s stock grew similarly to FNRN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBTCFNRN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
26%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EBTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNRN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FALGX49.370.45
+0.92%
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap M
KGDZX31.030.23
+0.75%
DWS Global Small Cap R6
GAMNX11.170.08
+0.72%
Gabelli Global Mini Mites AAA
GMXPX23.810.15
+0.63%
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts P
JGMAX25.490.12
+0.47%
Janus Henderson Triton A

EBTC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBTC has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EBTC jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBTC
1D Price
Change %
EBTC100%
+3.44%
THFF - EBTC
72%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
GSBC - EBTC
72%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
FFBC - EBTC
72%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
HTH - EBTC
72%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
CCBG - EBTC
71%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
More

FNRN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNRN has been loosely correlated with ORRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNRN jumps, then ORRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNRN
1D Price
Change %
FNRN100%
-0.25%
ORRF - FNRN
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
FNWD - FNRN
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
PSBQ - FNRN
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FDVA - FNRN
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
EBTC - FNRN
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.44%
More