EBTC
Price
$34.13
Change
+$0.36 (+1.07%)
Updated
Apr 14, 04:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
318.88M
HWC
Price
$47.45
Change
+$0.83 (+1.78%)
Updated
Apr 14, 04:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4B
One day until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EBTC vs HWC

Header iconEBTC vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts EBTC vs HWCBanner chart's image
Enterprise Ban
Price$34.13
Change+$0.36 (+1.07%)
Volume$100
Capitalization318.88M
Hancock Whitney
Price$47.45
Change+$0.83 (+1.78%)
Volume$1.32K
Capitalization4B
EBTC vs HWC Comparison Chart
Loading...
EBTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBTC vs. HWC commentary
Apr 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBTC is a Hold and HWC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 14, 2025
Stock price -- (EBTC: $33.77 vs. HWC: $46.61)
Brand notoriety: EBTC and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBTC: 63% vs. HWC: 81%
Market capitalization -- EBTC: $318.88M vs. HWC: $4B
EBTC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $318.88M. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBTC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EBTC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EBTC and HWC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EBTC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EBTC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the short-term than EBTC.

Price Growth

EBTC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.96% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

EBTC is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($4B) has a higher market cap than EBTC($319M). HWC has higher P/E ratio than EBTC: HWC (9.98) vs EBTC (8.18). EBTC (-14.102) and HWC (-14.112) have similar YTD gains . HWC has more cash in the bank: 561M vs. EBTC (45.3M). EBTC has less debt than HWC: EBTC (110M) vs HWC (1.52B). HWC has higher revenues than EBTC: HWC (1.37B) vs EBTC (171M).
EBTCHWCEBTC / HWC
Capitalization319M4B8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-14.102-14.112100%
P/E Ratio8.189.9882%
Revenue171M1.37B13%
Total Cash45.3M561M8%
Total Debt110M1.52B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EBTC vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
EBTC
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5324
SMR RATING
1..100
118
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1451
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBTC (65). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to EBTC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBTC (53). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to EBTC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBTC (11). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to EBTC’s over the last 12 months.

EBTC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (59). This means that EBTC’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

EBTC's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWC (51). This means that EBTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBTCHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EBTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EILIX12.400.31
+2.56%
Eaton Vance International Small-Cap I
PRACX41.050.69
+1.71%
Putnam Research C
MDFSX7.090.11
+1.58%
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
PIREX27.030.38
+1.43%
Principal Real Estate Securities Inst
FIIMX20.150.28
+1.41%
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II I

EBTC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBTC has been closely correlated with CCBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EBTC jumps, then CCBG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBTC
1D Price
Change %
EBTC100%
-0.97%
CCBG - EBTC
76%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
THFF - EBTC
76%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
SHBI - EBTC
76%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
HWC - EBTC
75%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
FFBC - EBTC
75%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
More

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
-0.02%
ASB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
FNB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
ABCB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
UCB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
ONB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+2.02%
More