Ad is loading...
EBTC
Price
$36.65
Change
-$0.46 (-1.24%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
67 days until earnings call
PFLC
Price
$12.45
Change
+$0.40 (+3.32%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

EBTC vs PFLC

Header iconEBTC vs PFLC Comparison
Open Charts EBTC vs PFLCBanner chart's image
Enterprise Ban
Price$36.65
Change-$0.46 (-1.24%)
Volume$15.43K
CapitalizationN/A
Pacific Financial
Price$12.45
Change+$0.40 (+3.32%)
Volume$16.31K
CapitalizationN/A
EBTC vs PFLC Comparison Chart
Loading...
EBTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBTC vs. PFLC commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBTC is a StrongSell and PFLC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (EBTC: $36.65 vs. PFLC: $12.45)
Brand notoriety: EBTC and PFLC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBTC: 75% vs. PFLC: 258%
Market capitalization -- EBTC: $318.88M vs. PFLC: $104.38M
EBTC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $318.88M. PFLC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $104.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBTC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFLC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EBTC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFLC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFLC is a better buy in the long-term than EBTC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EBTC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EBTC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

EBTC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.57% price change this week, while PFLC (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

EBTC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

PFLC is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EBTC($319M) has a higher market cap than PFLC($104M). EBTC has higher P/E ratio than PFLC: EBTC (8.18) vs PFLC (6.67). PFLC YTD gains are higher at: 22.710 vs. EBTC (17.506). EBTC has more cash in the bank: 45.3M vs. PFLC (16.6M). PFLC has less debt than EBTC: PFLC (13.4M) vs EBTC (110M). EBTC has higher revenues than PFLC: EBTC (171M) vs PFLC (55.4M).
EBTCPFLCEBTC / PFLC
Capitalization319M104M307%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.50622.71077%
P/E Ratio8.186.67123%
Revenue171M55.4M309%
Total Cash45.3M16.6M273%
Total Debt110M13.4M821%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EBTC vs PFLC: Fundamental Ratings
EBTC
PFLC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5347
SMR RATING
1..100
2349
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1915
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFLC's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as EBTC (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFLC’s stock grew similarly to EBTC’s over the last 12 months.

PFLC's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as EBTC (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFLC’s stock grew similarly to EBTC’s over the last 12 months.

EBTC's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFLC (49) in the null industry. This means that EBTC’s stock grew similarly to PFLC’s over the last 12 months.

EBTC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFLC (42) in the null industry. This means that EBTC’s stock grew similarly to PFLC’s over the last 12 months.

PFLC's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as EBTC (19) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFLC’s stock grew similarly to EBTC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBTC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EBTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGIIX88.42-0.32
-0.36%
JPMorgan US Value I
WINAX9.04-0.04
-0.44%
Wilmington International A
ECSMX12.13-0.09
-0.74%
Eaton Vance Small-Cap C
FAPHX13.38-0.13
-0.96%
Fidelity Healthy Future
MUESX36.55-0.58
-1.56%
MFS Blended Research Core Equity R2

EBTC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBTC has been closely correlated with FNLC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EBTC jumps, then FNLC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBTC
1D Price
Change %
EBTC100%
-1.24%
FNLC - EBTC
75%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
CCBG - EBTC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
SHBI - EBTC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
SMBK - EBTC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
THFF - EBTC
73%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
More

PFLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PFLC and KNFSF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFLC and KNFSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFLC
1D Price
Change %
PFLC100%
+3.32%
KNFSF - PFLC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPIRY - PFLC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
EBTC - PFLC
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
EVBN - PFLC
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
VABK - PFLC
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
More