EBZT
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
12.6M
NPACY
Price
$1.01
Change
-$0.03 (-2.88%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
Capitalization
767.63M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EBZT vs NPACY

Header iconEBZT vs NPACY Comparison
Open Charts EBZT vs NPACYBanner chart's image
EVERYTHING BLOCKCHAIN
Price$0.12
Change-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Volume$35.57K
Capitalization12.6M
Quadient SA
Price$1.01
Change-$0.03 (-2.88%)
Volume$7.5K
Capitalization767.63M
EBZT vs NPACY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBZT vs. NPACY commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBZT is a Hold and NPACY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (EBZT: $0.12 vs. NPACY: $1.01)
Brand notoriety: EBZT and NPACY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBZT: 123% vs. NPACY: 100%
Market capitalization -- EBZT: $12.6M vs. NPACY: $767.63M
EBZT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $12.6M. NPACY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $767.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBZT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPACY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EBZT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NPACY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EBZT is a better buy in the long-term than NPACY.

Price Growth

EBZT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.79% price change this week, while NPACY (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

NPACY is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPACY($768M) has a higher market cap than EBZT($12.6M). EBZT YTD gains are higher at: 576.164 vs. NPACY (0.000). NPACY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 228M vs. EBZT (-5.86M). NPACY has more cash in the bank: 133M vs. EBZT (6K). EBZT has less debt than NPACY: EBZT (519K) vs NPACY (910M). NPACY has higher revenues than EBZT: NPACY (1.04B) vs EBZT (2.62M).
EBZTNPACYEBZT / NPACY
Capitalization12.6M768M2%
EBITDA-5.86M228M-3%
Gain YTD576.1640.000-
P/E RatioN/A10.98-
Revenue2.62M1.04B0%
Total Cash6K133M0%
Total Debt519K910M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NPACY: Fundamental Ratings
NPACY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
47
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCGSF0.15N/A
+2.89%
Outcrop SILVER & GOLD CORP.
LTGHY3.180.03
+0.95%
Life Healthcare Group Holdings Ltd
RNMBY403.411.44
+0.36%
Rheinmetall AG
LGRDY24.31-0.08
-0.33%
LeGrand SA
BKRIY13.22-0.21
-1.56%
Bank Ireland Group PLC

EBZT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EBZT and GBUX have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EBZT and GBUX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBZT
1D Price
Change %
EBZT100%
-2.83%
GBUX - EBZT
25%
Poorly correlated
-12.79%
NXPL - EBZT
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.30%
OBIIF - EBZT
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPACY - EBZT
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OONEF - EBZT
0%
Poorly correlated
+10.29%
More

NPACY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NPACY and PXPHF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NPACY and PXPHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPACY
1D Price
Change %
NPACY100%
N/A
PXPHF - NPACY
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTRCF - NPACY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNAI - NPACY
27%
Poorly correlated
-10.19%
BOX - NPACY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
NTDOY - NPACY
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.13%
More