Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECAT vs GLO
ECAT vs GLO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECAT vs. GLO commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECAT is a StrongBuy and GLO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECAT has more net assets: 1.64B vs. GLO (257M). GLO has a higher annual dividend yield than ECAT: GLO (10.341) vs ECAT (8.062). ECAT was incepted earlier than GLO: ECAT (4 years) vs GLO (19 years). ECAT (1.30) has a lower expense ratio than GLO (3.01). ECAT has a higher turnover GLO (85.00) vs GLO (85.00).
| ECAT | GLO | ECAT / GLO | |
| Gain YTD | 8.062 | 10.341 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 1.64B | 257M | 639% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 3.01 | 43% |
| Turnover | 227.00 | 85.00 | 267% |
| Yield | 2.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ECAT | GLO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 14 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ECAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECAT has been loosely correlated with BSX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECAT jumps, then BSX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECAT | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| BSX - ECAT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| CRM - ECAT | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| AMT - ECAT | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| NEE - ECAT | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| MSFT - ECAT | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
More | ||||
GLO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GLO and LRCX have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLO and LRCX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLO | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| LRCX - GLO | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| AIR - GLO | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
| DKNG - GLO | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| FERG - GLO | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
| BA - GLO | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.02% | ||
More | ||||