Ad is loading...
ECAT vs WBIF
ECAT vs WBIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECAT vs. WBIF commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECAT is a Hold and WBIF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECAT has more net assets: 1.63B vs. WBIF (30.2M). ECAT has a higher annual dividend yield than WBIF: ECAT (-0.403) vs WBIF (-0.936). ECAT was incepted earlier than WBIF: ECAT (4 years) vs WBIF (11 years). ECAT (1.30) has a lower expense ratio than WBIF (1.52). WBIF has a higher turnover ECAT (246.00) vs ECAT (246.00).
| ECAT | WBIF | ECAT / WBIF | |
| Gain YTD | -0.403 | -0.936 | 43% |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 30.2M | 5,391% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.52 | 86% |
| Turnover | 246.00 | 742.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 1.44 | 0.81 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ECAT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ECAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECAT has been loosely correlated with BSX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECAT jumps, then BSX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECAT | 100% | -3.26% | ||
| BSX - ECAT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| CRM - ECAT | 62% Loosely correlated | -6.01% | ||
| AMT - ECAT | 56% Loosely correlated | +4.72% | ||
| NEE - ECAT | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| MSFT - ECAT | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.36% | ||
More | ||||
WBIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WBIF has been loosely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WBIF jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WBIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBIF | 100% | -2.96% | ||
| JHG - WBIF | 64% Loosely correlated | -11.05% | ||
| CARR - WBIF | 55% Loosely correlated | -6.64% | ||
| KNTK - WBIF | 37% Loosely correlated | -8.69% | ||
| TW - WBIF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
| JNJ - WBIF | 17% Poorly correlated | +2.87% | ||
More | ||||