Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECAT vs WBIF
ECAT vs WBIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECAT vs. WBIF commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECAT is a StrongBuy and WBIF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECAT has more net assets: 1.65B vs. WBIF (28.7M). ECAT has a higher annual dividend yield than WBIF: ECAT (10.929) vs WBIF (2.557). ECAT was incepted earlier than WBIF: ECAT (4 years) vs WBIF (11 years). ECAT (1.30) has a lower expense ratio than WBIF (1.52). WBIF has a higher turnover ECAT (227.00) vs ECAT (227.00).
| ECAT | WBIF | ECAT / WBIF | |
| Gain YTD | 10.929 | 2.557 | 427% |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 28.7M | 5,753% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.52 | 86% |
| Turnover | 227.00 | 742.00 | 31% |
| Yield | 2.18 | 0.32 | 679% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ECAT | WBIF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 81% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ECAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECAT has been loosely correlated with BSX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECAT jumps, then BSX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECAT | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| BSX - ECAT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| CRM - ECAT | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| AMT - ECAT | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| NEE - ECAT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| MSFT - ECAT | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
More | ||||
WBIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WBIF has been closely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WBIF jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WBIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBIF | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| EQH - WBIF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| JHG - WBIF | 66% Closely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| MA - WBIF | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| SSNC - WBIF | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| JPM - WBIF | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||