Ad is loading...
ECBLX vs FFRHX
ECBLX vs FFRHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECBLX vs. FFRHX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECBLX is a Hold and FFRHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. ECBLX (4.53B). FFRHX pays higher dividends than ECBLX: FFRHX (8.13) vs ECBLX (7.13). ECBLX was incepted earlier than FFRHX: ECBLX (24 years) vs FFRHX (23 years). ECBLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). FFRHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. ECBLX (19.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECBLX: FFRHX (0) vs ECBLX (1000). FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.47 vs. ECBLX (4.33). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.55 vs. ECBLX (31.54).
| ECBLX | FFRHX | ECBLX / FFRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.73 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.73 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.916 | -0.828 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.53B | 16B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.13 | 8.13 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.33 | 5.47 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.19 | 21.03 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.54 | 44.55 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.70 | 55.04 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers