Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECBLX vs FFRIX
ECBLX vs FFRIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECBLX vs. FFRIX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECBLX is a Hold and FFRIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. ECBLX (3.99B). FFRIX pays higher dividends than ECBLX: FFRIX (7.64) vs ECBLX (6.69). ECBLX was incepted earlier than FFRIX: ECBLX (25 years) vs FFRIX (25 years). ECBLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FFRIX (0.77). FFRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. ECBLX (31.00). FFRIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECBLX: FFRIX (0) vs ECBLX (1000). FFRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. ECBLX (4.68). FFRIX return over 5 years is better than : 37.69 vs. ECBLX (24.88).
| ECBLX | FFRIX | ECBLX / FFRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.77 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.77 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.193 | 3.486 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 3.99B | 15.2B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.69 | 7.64 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.68 | 6.97 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.04 | 28.02 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.88 | 37.69 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.57 | 62.90 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers