Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECBLX vs FFRIX
ECBLX vs FFRIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECBLX vs. FFRIX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECBLX is a Hold and FFRIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. ECBLX (4.13B). FFRIX pays higher dividends than ECBLX: FFRIX (7.94) vs ECBLX (6.96). ECBLX was incepted earlier than FFRIX: ECBLX (24 years) vs FFRIX (25 years). ECBLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FFRIX (0.77). FFRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. ECBLX (31.00). FFRIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECBLX: FFRIX (0) vs ECBLX (1000). FFRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.33 vs. ECBLX (4.84). FFRIX return over 5 years is better than : 39.04 vs. ECBLX (27.60).
| ECBLX | FFRIX | ECBLX / FFRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.77 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.77 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.819 | 1.283 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.13B | 14.8B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.96 | 7.94 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.84 | 6.33 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.44 | 27.39 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.60 | 39.04 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.66 | 57.96 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement