Ad is loading...
ECBLX vs FFRIX
ECBLX vs FFRIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECBLX vs. FFRIX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECBLX is a Hold and FFRIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. ECBLX (4.53B). FFRIX pays higher dividends than ECBLX: FFRIX (8.09) vs ECBLX (7.13). ECBLX was incepted earlier than FFRIX: ECBLX (24 years) vs FFRIX (25 years). ECBLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FFRIX (0.77). FFRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. ECBLX (19.00). FFRIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECBLX: FFRIX (0) vs ECBLX (1000). FFRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.43 vs. ECBLX (4.33). FFRIX return over 5 years is better than : 44.29 vs. ECBLX (31.54).
| ECBLX | FFRIX | ECBLX / FFRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.77 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.77 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.916 | -0.841 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.53B | 16B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.13 | 8.09 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.33 | 5.43 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.19 | 20.91 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.54 | 44.29 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.70 | 54.33 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers