Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECBLX vs PFFRX
ECBLX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECBLX vs. PFFRX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECBLX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. ECBLX (3.93B). PFFRX pays higher dividends than ECBLX: PFFRX (7.28) vs ECBLX (6.09). ECBLX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: ECBLX (25 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). ECBLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.69). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.30 vs. ECBLX (31.00). ECBLX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: ECBLX (1000) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.89 vs. ECBLX (3.30). PFFRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.84 vs. ECBLX (24.16).
| ECBLX | PFFRX | ECBLX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.69 | 262% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.69 | 262% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.569 | 4.612 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93B | 5.21B | 75% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.09 | 7.28 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.30 | 6.89 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.65 | 31.64 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.16 | 36.84 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.65 | 64.48 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement