Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECBLX vs PFFRX
ECBLX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECBLX vs. PFFRX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECBLX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.98B vs. ECBLX (3.99B). PFFRX pays higher dividends than ECBLX: PFFRX (7.35) vs ECBLX (6.69). ECBLX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: ECBLX (25 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). ECBLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.69). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.30 vs. ECBLX (31.00). ECBLX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: ECBLX (1000) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.53 vs. ECBLX (4.68). PFFRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.68 vs. ECBLX (24.88).
| ECBLX | PFFRX | ECBLX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.69 | 262% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.69 | 262% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.193 | 4.460 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.99B | 4.98B | 80% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.69 | 7.35 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.68 | 7.53 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.04 | 29.60 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.88 | 36.68 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.57 | 63.33 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers