Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECBLX vs TRIZX
ECBLX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.35B vs. ECBLX (3.93B). TRIZX pays higher dividends than ECBLX: TRIZX (7.94) vs ECBLX (6.09). ECBLX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: ECBLX (25 years) vs TRIZX (6 years). ECBLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.61). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. ECBLX (31.00). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECBLX: TRIZX (0) vs ECBLX (1000). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.58 vs. ECBLX (3.30). TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 41.53 vs. ECBLX (24.16).
| ECBLX | TRIZX | ECBLX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.02 | 9,050% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.61 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.569 | 5.120 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93B | 4.35B | 90% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.09 | 7.94 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.30 | 7.58 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.65 | 33.96 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.16 | 41.53 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement