Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECBLX vs TRIZX
ECBLX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.33B vs. ECBLX (4.08B). TRIZX pays higher dividends than ECBLX: TRIZX (8.13) vs ECBLX (6.77). ECBLX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: ECBLX (25 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). ECBLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.61). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. ECBLX (31.00). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECBLX: TRIZX (0) vs ECBLX (1000). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.26 vs. ECBLX (4.77). TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 41.82 vs. ECBLX (26.12).
| ECBLX | TRIZX | ECBLX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.02 | 9,050% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.61 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.655 | 4.085 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.08B | 4.33B | 94% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.77 | 8.13 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.77 | 8.26 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.55 | 30.50 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.12 | 41.82 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers